Race and Financial Strain are Independent Correlates of Sleep in Midlife Women: The SWAN Sleep Study
Open accessAbstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To examine racial differences in sleep in a large cohort of midlife women and to evaluate whether indices of socioeconomic status (SES) are associated with racial differences in sleep. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Participants' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Caucasian (n=171), African American (n=138) and Chinese women (n=59). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Sleep quality was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Polysomnographically assessed sleep duration, continuity, architecture, and NREM electroencephalograhic (EEG) power were calculated over multiple nights. Sleep disordered breathing and periodic leg movements were measured on a separate night. Linear regression analysis was used to model the independent and synergistic effects of race and SES on sleep after adjusting for other factors that impact sleep in midlife women. Indices of SES were self-reported educational attainment and financial strain. RESULTS: Sleep was worse in African American women than Caucasian participants as measured by self-report, visual sleep stage scoring, and NREM EEG power. Slow wave sleep differences were also observed between Chinese and Caucasian participants. Racial differences persisted after adjustment for indices of SES. Although educational attainment was unrelated to sleep, financial strain was associated with decreased sleep quality and lower sleep efficiency. Financial strain-by-race interactions were not statistically significant, suggesting that financial strain has additive effects on sleep, independent of race. CONCLUSIONS: Independent relationships between race and financial strain with sleep were observed despite statistical adjustment for other factors that might account for these relationships. Results do not suggest that assessed indices of SES moderate the race-sleep relationship, perhaps due to too few women of low SES in the study.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Blacks/African-Americans had poorer sleep efficiency than Non-Hispanic Whites.
“and had poorer sleep efficiency(217, 219) than Non-Hispanic Whites.”
From Sleep: important considerations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (2016) · cites this paper as [219]
Blacks/African-Americans obtained less Slow Wave Sleep than Non-Hispanic Whites.
“Blacks/African-Americans also obtained less Slow Wave Sleep. Other studies have also found that Blacks/African-Americans obtained less Slow Wave Sleep(215-219)”
From Sleep: important considerations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (2016) · cites this paper as [219]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 326
- Authors
- Hall, M. H., Matthews, K. A., Kravitz, H. M., Gold, E. B., Buysse, D. J., Bromberger, J. T., Owens, J. F., & Sowers, M. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Martica H. Hall
- ORCID
- Venue
- Sleep
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-82
- ISSN
- 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-9109
- PMC
- PMC2625326
- OpenAlex
- W165310196
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 18.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- SLEEP (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (AG012535, NR004061, AG012531)
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Pfizer (RR024153)
- Sanofi
- University of Pittsburgh (RR024153)
- Rush University
- National Institutes of Health (3u01ag012535-03s2, RR024153)
- National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-012535, AG012531, U01AG012539, U01AG012505, AG019362, AG 012535, AG012495, AG 012554, U01AG012553, NR004061, AG019363, U01AG012495, AG019360, AG 012505, R01AG019362, AG 012546, AG019361, RR024153, AG012553, U01AG012554, R01AG019360, R01AG019361, U01AG012546, R01AG019363, U01AG012531, AG012539)
- National Institute of Nursing Research (AG012535, NR-004061, U01NR004061)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR-024153, UL1RR024153)
- Office of Research on Women's Health (AG012495, AG012539, AG012546, AG012554, AG012535, AG012531, NR004061, AG012553, AG012505)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Keywords
- financial stress, socioeconomic status, middle-aged women, African American women, Chinese women, sleep quality, sleep efficiency, slow-wave sleep, sleep architecture, sleep-disordered breathing, periodic limb movements, educational attainment
- MeSH terms
- Asian, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Fourier Analysis, Health Surveys, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Socioeconomic Factors, Polysomnography, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Nocturnal Myoclonus Syndrome, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review