Cited by 84Social Media in Health EducationOphthalmology and Visual Health ResearchGlaucoma and retinal disorders

Use and Views on Social Networking Sites of Pharmacy Students in the United Kingdom

Open access
Hall, Maurice, Hanna, Lezley-Anne, Huey, Gwyneth·2013·American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Abstract

Objective. To investigate students' use and views on social networking sites and assess differences in attitudes between genders and years in the program.Methods. All pharmacy undergraduate students were invited via e-mail to complete an electronic questionnaire consisting of 21 questions relating to social networking.Results. Most (91.8%) of the 377 respondents reported using social networking Web sites, with 98.6% using Facebook and 33.7% using Twitter. Female students were more likely than male students to agree that they had been made sufficiently aware of the professional behavior expected of them when using social networking sites (76.6% vs 58.1% p=0.002) and to agree that students should have the same professional standards whether on placement or using social networking sites (76.3% vs 61.6%; p<0.001).Conclusions. A high level of social networking use and potentially inappropriate attitudes towards professionalism were found among pharmacy students. Further training may be useful to ensure pharmacy students are aware of how to apply codes of conduct when using social networking sites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5688/ajpe7719

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar findings were confirmed for health science students who struggle with the concepts associated with professionalism.

    “Similar findings were confirmed also for health science students who struggle with the concepts associated with professionalism [182].”

    From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [182]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports that many UK pharmacy students distinguish their conduct on social networking sites from professional conduct, supporting a concern about how they apply professionalism online. The claim broadens this finding to health science students generally and to concepts of professionalism beyond social networking, which this study does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 84

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Joinson A. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. Proceedings of the 26 th annual SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: pp 1027-1036. http://people.bath.ac.uk/aj266/pubs_pdf/1149-joinson.pdf. Accessed August 6, 2012.

Authors
Hall, M., Hanna, L.-A., & Huey, G.
Affiliations
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Venue
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
9
ISSN
0002-9459 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002420741
Cited by
84
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
9.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • Queen's University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Keywords
social networking sites, pharmacy students, intraocular pressure, coronary artery calcification, cardiovascular disease, subclinical atherosclerosis, glaucoma, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Social Responsibility, Students, Pharmacy, Chi-Square Distribution, Privacy, Professional Role, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review