An Illustrated Guide to Poster Design
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research advocates for structured formats such as IMRAD, which improves clarity and logical flow.
“Previous research advocates for the use of structured formats, such as the IMRAD format (introduction, methods, results, and discussion), which improves clarity and aids in the logical flow of information and ensures proper conduct of research [6].”
From What Makes a Good Poster? Evaluating #BetterPoster and Classic Formats at a Scientific Cancer Conference (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bentsen, L., & Østergaard, D. E. (2026) · Journal of Cancer Education · doi:10.1007/s13187-025-02622-1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rose, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Roseman University of Health Sciences (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rose, Tyler M.
- ORCID
- Rose, Tyler M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 6423
- ISSN
- 0002-9459 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5663659
- OpenAlex
- W2766322299
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Keywords
- poster design, scientific poster presentations, scholarly communication, visual communication, pharmacy education
- MeSH terms
- Audiovisual Aids, Education, Pharmacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
