Cure of duodenal ulcer after eradication of Helicobacter pylori
Abstract
Eighty-two patients, whose duodenal ulcers were recurrent or resistant to H2-receptor antagonist therapy, were entered in a treatment protocol of ranitidine followed by a four-week "triple therapy" course to eradicate Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection. The triple therapy consisted of colloidal bismuth subcitrate, tetracycline and metronidazole. Duodenal ulcer healed in all 78 patients available for endoscopy and H. pylori infection was shown to be eliminated in 75 patients (96%) at rebiopsy four weeks after cessation of therapy. In these 75 remaining patients the relapse rates for H. pylori infection and duodenal ulcer were studied endoscopically, yearly and at any recurrence of symptoms. At Year 1, 71 of 73 patients remained free of H. pylori infection (HP-negative) and duodenal ulcer. The corresponding figures subsequently were: Year 2, 57/57; Year 3, 34/34; Year 4, 15/15. No duodenal ulcers recurred in HP-negative patients who were followed for up to four years. Two patients of the original cohort of 75 HP-negative patients were HP-positive with endoscopic duodenitis at 12 months, and one at 36 months, but all were without reulceration. Distorted duodenal caps gradually returned to near-normal appearance in 80% of patients by two years. From this four-year follow-up study we conclude that duodenal ulcer disease will not recur provided the patient remains free of H. pylori.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adding antibiotics to standard of care produced similar benefits and provided strong evidence for H. pylori as a causal agent to subsequent disease.
“Similar benefits from adding antibiotics to the standard of care were obtained by other investigators [13–16], providing strong evidence for H. pylori as a causal agent to subsequent disease.”
From What would it take to prove that a chronic infection is a causal agent in Alzheimer’s disease? (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What would it take to prove that a chronic infection is a causal agent in Alzheimer’s disease?
Brutkiewicz, R. R., Cao, W., Morgan, D., Reis, R. S. D., Suryadevara, V., Willette, A. A., Willette, S. A., Wyatt-Johnson, S. K., & Duggan, M. R. (2025) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2025.05.009 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- George, L. L., Borody, T. J., Andrews, P., Devine, M., Moore‐Jones, D., Walton, M., & Brandi, S.
- Affiliations
- Centre For Digestive Diseases (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Borody, Thomas J
- Venue
- Medical Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- AMPCo
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 145-149
- ISSN
- 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
- 1326-5377
- OpenAlex
- W505461
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 37.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- duodenal ulcer, Helicobacter pylori eradication, triple therapy, bismuth subcitrate, tetracycline, metronidazole, ranitidine, ulcer recurrence, duodenal ulcer healing, long-term follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Anti-Ulcer Agents, Campylobacter Infections, Duodenal Ulcer, Duodenitis, Duodenum, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gastroscopy, Histamine H2 Antagonists, Humans, Male, Metronidazole, Middle Aged, Organometallic Compounds, Recurrence, Tetracycline
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review