The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Apparent discontinuation rates in patients prescribed lipid‐lowering drugs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate apparent discontinuation rates in patients newly prescribed lipid-lowering drugs. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective survey of 12 months' dispensing data in 138 community pharmacies across metropolitan Sydney. PATIENTS: 610 adults (49% men) with a mean age of 58 years; 91% of prescriptions were from general practitioners; prescribed drugs were simvastatin (54%), pravastatin (31%) and gemfibrozil (15%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of patients failing to collect prescription refills. RESULTS: 60% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 56%-64%) apparently discontinued their medication over 12 months. Half of the apparent discontinuations occurred within three months and a quarter within one month of starting treatment. The predominant reasons for discontinuation were: patient unconvinced about need for treatment (32%), poor efficacy (32%) and adverse events (7%). Only half of those experiencing poor efficacy were switched to another drug. The relative risk (RR) of discontinuation was lower in older patients (age 65+ v. <50 years: RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.47-0.93) and in those using other cardiovascular drugs (RR 0.69; CI 0.56-0.86), but was increased in those showing early evidence of poor compliance (RR 1.77; CI 1.33-2.35). Discontinuation appeared to be unrelated to sex, the source of the prescription (general practitioner or specialist), past use of lipid-lowering drugs or the cost of medication. CONCLUSIONS: High apparent discontinuation rates with lipid-lowering drugs suggest significant wastage of resources in treatments that are initiated but not continued and a lost opportunity for heart disease prevention. Many patients appear to discontinue therapy for illogical reasons and this may be amenable to intervention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Patient non-compliance: Deviance or reasoned decision-making?
Donovan, J. L., & Blake, D. R. (1992) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90206-6 · Cited by 785
Cited by
(1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199811053391902 · Cited by 5,261
Long-term persistence in use of statin therapy in elderly patients
Benner, J. S. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.4.455 · Cited by 1,232
Adherence with statin therapy in elderly patients with and without acute coronary syndromes
Jackevicius, C. A. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.4.462 · Cited by 1,077
Metabolic Syndrome and Insulin Resistance: Underlying Causes and Modification by Exercise Training
Roberts, C. K., Hevener, A. L., & Barnard, R. J. (2013) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c110062 · Cited by 831
National Lipid Association Recommendations for Patient-Centered Management of Dyslipidemia: Part 2
Jacobson, T. A., Maki, K. C., Orringer, C. E., Jones, P. H., Kris-Etherton, P., Sikand, G., La Forge, R., Daniels, S. R., Wilson, D. P., Morris, P. B., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Lipidology · doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2015.09.002 · Cited by 784
Metadata
- Authors
- Simons, L. A., Levis, G., & Simons, J.
- Venue
- Medical Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- AMPCo
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 208-211
- ISSN
- 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
- 1326-5377
- OpenAlex
- W116577846
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Apparent discontinuation rates in patients prescribed lipid‐lowering drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb94138.x
- The paper
- Simons, L. A., Levis, G., & Simons, J. (1996). Apparent discontinuation rates in patients prescribed lipid‐lowering drugs. Medical Journal of Australia. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb94138.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.