Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Apparent discontinuation rates in patients prescribed lipid‐lowering drugs

Simons, Leon A, Levis, Graham, Simons, Judith·1996·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate apparent discontinuation rates in patients newly prescribed lipid-lowering drugs. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective survey of 12 months' dispensing data in 138 community pharmacies across metropolitan Sydney. PATIENTS: 610 adults (49% men) with a mean age of 58 years; 91% of prescriptions were from general practitioners; prescribed drugs were simvastatin (54%), pravastatin (31%) and gemfibrozil (15%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number of patients failing to collect prescription refills. RESULTS: 60% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 56%-64%) apparently discontinued their medication over 12 months. Half of the apparent discontinuations occurred within three months and a quarter within one month of starting treatment. The predominant reasons for discontinuation were: patient unconvinced about need for treatment (32%), poor efficacy (32%) and adverse events (7%). Only half of those experiencing poor efficacy were switched to another drug. The relative risk (RR) of discontinuation was lower in older patients (age 65+ v. <50 years: RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.47-0.93) and in those using other cardiovascular drugs (RR 0.69; CI 0.56-0.86), but was increased in those showing early evidence of poor compliance (RR 1.77; CI 1.33-2.35). Discontinuation appeared to be unrelated to sex, the source of the prescription (general practitioner or specialist), past use of lipid-lowering drugs or the cost of medication. CONCLUSIONS: High apparent discontinuation rates with lipid-lowering drugs suggest significant wastage of resources in treatments that are initiated but not continued and a lost opportunity for heart disease prevention. Many patients appear to discontinue therapy for illogical reasons and this may be amenable to intervention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb94138.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Simons, L. A., Levis, G., & Simons, J.
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
1996-02
Volume
164
Issue
4
Pages
208-211
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W116577846
Cited by
214
References
1
FWCI
7.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Apparent discontinuation rates in patients prescribed lipid‐lowering drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb94138.x
The paper
Simons, L. A., Levis, G., & Simons, J. (1996). Apparent discontinuation rates in patients prescribed lipid‐lowering drugs. Medical Journal of Australia. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb94138.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.