Cited by 128Human-Animal Interaction StudiesBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiac Health and Mental Health

Pet ownership and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: another look

Parslow, Ruth A, Jorm, Anthony F·2003·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

Objective: To test the claim that pet ownership reduces cardiovascular risk. Design: Community survey. Participants: 2528 adults aged 40–44 years and 2551 aged 60–64 years who lived in the Australian Capital Territory and Queanbeyan, New South Wales, and were drawn randomly from the Australian electoral roll in 2000 and 2001. Main outcome measures: Sociodemographic measures, including pet ownership, and measures of physical health (including body mass index [BMI], alcohol and cigarette consumption, and levels of physical activity). Two readings of diastolic and systolic blood pressure were also taken. Results: While pet owners and non‐pet owners had similar levels of systolic blood pressure, those with pets had significantly higher diastolic blood pressure. Pet owners also had higher BMI and were more likely to smoke. While those with pets undertook more mild physical activity, they continued to have significantly higher diastolic blood pressure after controlling for hypertensive risk factors. Conclusions: In this study, we found no evidence that pet ownership per se is associated with cardiovascular health benefits. Rather, pet owners had higher diastolic blood pressure than those without pets. It is likely that this increased health risk is linked to other hypertensive risk factors that are only indirectly associated with pet ownership.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05649.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parslow, R. A., & Jorm, A. F.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11
Volume
179
Issue
9
Pages
466-468
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W46471749
Cited by
128
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
pet ownership, cardiovascular disease, blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, hypertension risk factors, body mass index, smoking, physical activity, alcohol consumption, middle-aged and older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Blood Pressure, Human-Animal Bond, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, New South Wales, Random Allocation, Risk Factors, Sampling Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Case-Control Studies, Australian Capital Territory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review