The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Non‐melanoma skin cancer in Australia: the 2002 national survey and trends since 1985
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To measure the incidence of treated non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in Australia in 2002 and investigate trends since 1985 by histological type, sex, age group, latitude and skin type. DESIGN: Face-to-face survey between 1 January and 31 December 2002 using stratified sampling of households to identify people treated for skin cancer in the previous 12 months. Self-reported diagnoses were confirmed with treatment providers. Data from similar surveys conducted in 1985, 1990 and 1995 were used to assess trends. SETTING: Whole of Australia (population 19.6 million). PARTICIPANTS: Of 57 215 people interviewed, 4098 said they had been treated for skin cancer in the past year and 3198 gave permission for their diagnoses to be confirmed with their doctor. RESULTS: 817 people were confirmed as having at least one skin cancer treated in the past year. The age-standardised rate per 100 000 population for NMSC was 1170, for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) 884, and for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) 387. The estimated number of NMSC cases in Australia for 2002 was 374 000. Cumulative risks to age 70 years of having at least one NMSC were 70% for men and 58% for women. Rates of BCC and SCC have increased since 1985, and the increases greatest for people aged 60 years and older; rates for those younger than 60 years have stabilised. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of treated NMSC in Australia in 2002 was more than five times the incidence of all other cancers combined. Although the overall NMSC rates have risen since 1985, the stabilisation of rates for people younger than 60 years who were exposed to skin cancer prevention programs in their youth highlights the importance of maintaining and strengthening these programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Basal Cell Skin Cancer, Version 1.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Bichakjian, C. K., Olencki, T., Aasi, S. Z., Alam, M., Andersen, J. S., Berg, D., Bowen, G. M., Cheney, R. T., Daniels, G. A., Glass, L. F., et al. (2016) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2016.0065 · Cited by 275
Human pigmentation variation: evolution, genetic basis, and implications for public health
Parra, E. J. (2007) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20727 · Cited by 191
Lucas, R. M., Norval, M., Neale, R. E., Young, A. R., de Gruijl, F. R., Takizawa, Y., & van der Leun, J. C. (2014) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/c4pp90033b · Cited by 158
Seven‐year trends in sun protection and sunburn among Australian adolescents and adults
Volkov, A., Dobbinson, S., Wakefield, M., & Slevin, T. (2013) · Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12012 · Cited by 106
Smoking and the Risk of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Leonardi-Bee, J., Ellison, T., & Bath-Hextall, F. (2012) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1374 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Staples, M. P., Elwood, M., Burton, R. C., Williams, J. L., Marks, R., & Giles, G. G.
- Venue
- Medical Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- AMPCo
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-10
- ISSN
- 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
- 1326-5377
- OpenAlex
- W125463860
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non‐melanoma skin cancer in Australia: the 2002 national survey and trends since 1985. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00086.x
- The paper
- Staples, M. P., Elwood, M., Burton, R. C., Williams, J. L., Marks, R., & Giles, G. G. (2006). Non‐melanoma skin cancer in Australia: the 2002 national survey and trends since 1985. Medical Journal of Australia. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00086.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.