E‐mental health: a new era in delivery of mental health services
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Technology-based psychological interventions are widely seen as an effective complementary source for addressing accessibility issues.
“Technology-based psychological interventions (TBIs) are widely seen as an effective complementary source for addressing the issues of accessibility.14”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Christensen, H., & Hickie, I. B.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Christensen, Helen
- Venue
- Medical Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- AMPCo
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 192
- Issue
- S11
- Pages
- S2-3
- ISSN
- 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
- 1326-5377
- OpenAlex
- W2339042525
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- e-mental health, digital mental health services, digital mental health interventions, telemedicine, mental health service delivery
- MeSH terms
- Australia, Mental Disorders, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Mental Health Services, Telemedicine, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review