Cited by 40Digital Imaging in MedicineMedical and Health Sciences ResearchElectronic Health Records Systems

Teledermatology and clinical photography: safeguarding patient privacy and mitigating medico‐legal risk

Open access
Stevenson, Paul, Finnane, Anna R, Soyer, H Peter·2016·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

Capturing clinical images is becoming more prevalent in everyday clinical practice, and dermatology lends itself to the use of clinical photographs and teledermatology. "Store-and-forward", whereby clinical images are forwarded to a specialist who later responds with an opinion on diagnosis and management is a popular form of teledermatology. Store-and-forward teledermatology has proven accurate and reliable, accelerating the process of diagnosis and treatment and improving patient outcomes. Practitioners' personal smartphones and other devices are often used to capture and communicate clinical images. Patient privacy can be placed at risk with the use of this technology. Practitioners should obtain consent for taking images, explain how they will be used, apply appropriate security in their digital communications, and delete images and other data on patients from personal devices after saving these to patient health records. Failing to use appropriate security precautions poses an emerging medico-legal risk for practitioners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/mja15.00996

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adherence to established privacy and ethics regulations may pose substantial medicolegal risks to clinicians capturing patient photographs.

    “Adherence to established privacy and ethics regulations may pose substantial medicolegal risks to clinicians capturing patient photographs [50].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevenson, P., Finnane, A. R., & Soyer, H. P.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Stevenson, Paul
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
2016-03
Volume
204
Issue
5
Pages
198-200
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W2318370575
Cited by
40
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
teledermatology, store-and-forward teledermatology, medical photography, patient privacy, medicolegal risk, informed consent, image security, data deletion, health records
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Australia, Confidentiality, Dermatology, Humans, Informed Consent, Photography, Referral and Consultation, Computer Security, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review