Teledermatology and clinical photography: safeguarding patient privacy and mitigating medico‐legal risk
Open accessAbstract
Capturing clinical images is becoming more prevalent in everyday clinical practice, and dermatology lends itself to the use of clinical photographs and teledermatology. "Store-and-forward", whereby clinical images are forwarded to a specialist who later responds with an opinion on diagnosis and management is a popular form of teledermatology. Store-and-forward teledermatology has proven accurate and reliable, accelerating the process of diagnosis and treatment and improving patient outcomes. Practitioners' personal smartphones and other devices are often used to capture and communicate clinical images. Patient privacy can be placed at risk with the use of this technology. Practitioners should obtain consent for taking images, explain how they will be used, apply appropriate security in their digital communications, and delete images and other data on patients from personal devices after saving these to patient health records. Failing to use appropriate security precautions poses an emerging medico-legal risk for practitioners.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adherence to established privacy and ethics regulations may pose substantial medicolegal risks to clinicians capturing patient photographs.
“Adherence to established privacy and ethics regulations may pose substantial medicolegal risks to clinicians capturing patient photographs [50].”
From Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
Teledermatology: A Review of Reliability and Accuracy of Diagnosis and Management
S. Levin, Y., & Warshaw, E. M. (2009) · Dermatologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.det.2008.11.012 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Clinicians and their cameras: policy, ethics and practice in an Australian tertiary hospital
Burns, K., & Belton, S. (2013) · Australian Health Review · doi:10.1071/ah12039 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Granja, C., Janssen, W., & Johansen, M. A. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10235 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
“Multimedia Appendix 1 [19-239] presents the outcomes.”
Wang, R. H., Barbieri, J. S., Nguyen, H. P., Stavert, R., Forman, H. P., Bolognia, J. L., & Kovarik, C. L. (2020) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.01.065 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Abbott, L. M., Magnusson, R. S., Gibbs, E., & Smith, S. D. (2018) · Australasian Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ajd.12583 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review
Jiang, S. W., Flynn, M. S., Kwock, J. T., & Nicholas, M. W. (2022) · JMIR Dermatology · doi:10.2196/37517 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“For this reason, clinicians should obtain proper patient consent, explain how images will be used, and delete the images from their smartphones after being uploaded to patient charts while ensuring sufficient security in their digital communications [50].”
BackgroundKozera, E. K., Yang, A., & Murrell, D. F. (2016) · International Journal of Women's Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.ijwd.2016.06.004 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Morrissette, S., Pearlman, R. L., Kovar, M., Sisson, W. T., Brodell, R. T., & Nahar, V. K. (2022) · Archives of Dermatological Research · doi:10.1007/s00403-021-02208-z · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stevenson, P., Finnane, A. R., & Soyer, H. P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Stevenson, Paul
- Venue
- Medical Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- AMPCo
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 204
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 198-200
- ISSN
- 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
- 1326-5377
- OpenAlex
- W2318370575
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- teledermatology, store-and-forward teledermatology, medical photography, patient privacy, medicolegal risk, informed consent, image security, data deletion, health records
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Australia, Confidentiality, Dermatology, Humans, Informed Consent, Photography, Referral and Consultation, Computer Security, Remote Consultation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review