Current management of glaucoma
Abstract
Glaucoma is an irreversible progressive optic neuropathy, for which the major proven treatment is to lower the intraocular pressure (IOP). Five groups of IOP-lowering eye drops have varying mechanisms of action. Some drops, such as β-blockers and α-2 agonists, have potentially serious systemic side effects. Acetazolamide is the only available oral agent; it is effective at lowering IOP, but significant side effects relegate its use usually to refractory glaucoma. Two new eye drops, netarsudil and latanoprostene bunod, have recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Both have novel IOP-lowering mechanisms and target the conventional aqueous outflow system. Selective laser trabeculoplasty is a gentle treatment that enhances conventional aqueous outflow. It may be used as an initial treatment, as a substitute for eye drops, or to delay glaucoma drainage surgery. Recent advancements in glaucoma surgery have seen an influx of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery devices, which are being used more frequently and earlier on in the treatment paradigm. As limited long term data are available, trabeculectomy remains the gold standard IOP-lowering procedure. Improvements in drug delivery are on the horizon. Drug-eluting devices and implants are able to deliver the drug closer to the receptors for an extended period of time. This will improve treatment adherence and efficacy, which are major limitations with current medical therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lowering IOP is currently the only clinically approved therapeutic option for glaucoma patients.
“Lowering the IOP is currently the only clinically approved therapeutic option for patients and is achieved through drugs and/or surgery that target the aqueous humor outflow pathways in the anterior segment of the eye (Lusthaus and Goldberg, 2019; Weinreb et al., 2014).”
From Sustained Vision Recovery by OSK Gene Therapy in a Mouse Model of Glaucoma (2023) · cites this paper as Lusthaus and Goldberg, 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 91 · Cited by 354
- Authors
- Lusthaus, J., & Goldberg, I.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Goldberg, Ivan
- Venue
- Medical Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-02-14
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 180-187
- ISSN
- 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
- 1326-5377
- OpenAlex
- W2913596175
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
- Keywords
- glaucoma, intraocular pressure reduction, beta-blockers, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, acetazolamide, netarsudil, latanoprostene bunod, selective laser trabeculoplasty, aqueous humor outflow, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, trabeculectomy, drug-eluting implants, medication adherence
- MeSH terms
- Glaucoma, Humans, Ophthalmic Solutions, Trabeculectomy, Drug Delivery Systems, Laser Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review