Considerations of delayed gastric emptying with peri‐operative use of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists
Open accessAbstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs), such as semaglutide, dulaglutide and liraglutide, augment glucose-dependent β-cell insulin release, suppress glucagon secretion, and slow gastric emptying. In Australia, they are available as daily (liraglutide) or weekly (dulaglutide, semaglutide) subcutaneous injections; internationally, semaglutide is also available in a daily oral preparation. GLP-1 RAs have increased in popularity in recent years due to their potent effect on glycaemia and adiposity, as well as their cardiovascular benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes.1-3 There has been increasing interest in the use of GLP-1 RAs at higher doses for the management of obesity.4 The combination of a GLP-1 RA with a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide RA as tirzepatide led to > 20% weight loss in the majority of clinical trial participants with and without diabetes.5, 6 The use of these medications is likely to increase, and possible adverse events should be highlighted. The most commonly reported side effects of GLP-1 RAs are gastrointestinal, specifically nausea and vomiting.1-3 An emerging possible adverse event related to the effects of GLP-1 RAs on gastric emptying is aspiration during anaesthetic, regardless of best management. Few large studies have assessed the effects of GLP-1 RAs on gastric emptying, and questions remain regarding the methodologies used to measure it.7 The effects of GLP-1 and GLP-1 RAs on gastric emptying are purported to differ between short- and long-acting formulations. In a small Japanese study, short-acting lixisenatide delayed gastric emptying, whereas liraglutide and dulaglutide did not.8 However, the doses of the longer acting formulations used in this study were lower than those currently available in Australia (liraglutide 0.9 mg daily and dulaglutide 0.75 mg weekly). In a randomised trial comparing short-acting lixisenatide (20 μg daily) and liraglutide (1.2 mg and 1.8 mg daily), both in combination with insulin glargine, lixisenatide markedly delayed gastric emptying and lowered post prandial glucose levels.9 Although it has also been suggested that the effect of GLP-1 RAs on gastric emptying may lessen with prolonged exposure, there is limited evidence to support this. Small studies of GLP-1 infusions demonstrated rapid tachyphylaxis for up to 24 hours.10, 11 Although there have been a number of studies assessing the use of GLP-1 RAs in the peri-operative period, few have assessed gastrointestinal effects such as nausea or gastric emptying.12 The benefits of tight glycaemic control in the peri-operative period, particularly in relation to post-operative infection, have supported the use and continuation of GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing surgery.13, 14 In the studies that did assess nausea, there did not appear to be an increase in post-operative nausea with GLP-1 RA use.13, 14 We recently reported two cases of retained gastric contents with use of GLP-1 RAs before gastroscopy.15 Additionally, a matched pair case–control study of 205 pairs with diabetes undergoing oesophagogastroduodenoscopy found increased rates of retained solid gastric residue with GLP-1 RA use (5.4% v 0.5%).16 Similarly, a single-centre retrospective audit of 404 oesophagogastroduodenoscopy patients found higher rates of retained solid gastric contents or > 0.8 mL/kg retained fluid content in patients exposed to semaglutide (n = 33) in the 30 days before the procedure compared with those not exposed (24.2% v 5.1%, respectively).17 The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the 24 hours before the procedure was associated with retained gastric contents. Interestingly, the mean time since last dose of semaglutide was ten days, and one patient in the semaglutide group developed pulmonary aspiration.17 In a case report, retained gastric contents were associated with pulmonary aspiration in the presence of semaglutide initiation two months previously.18 Until recently, many position statements and review articles had suggested not withholding GLP-1 RAs pre-operatively in patients with type 2 diabetes, unless post-operative pancreatitis or ileus was present.19, 20 In its consensus-based guidance on pre-operative management of patients receiving GLP-1 RAs, the American Society of Anesthesiologists suggested that patients treated with GLP-1 RAs who require urgent surgery should be treated as though they have a full stomach, with appropriate airway protection.21 In patients undergoing elective surgery, it recommends that the GLP-1 RA be withheld for one dose (either the day or week of surgery, depending on formulation) and the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms should be considered when assessing risk.21 The statement highlights that there is insufficient evidence to suggest the optimal duration of fasting for patients exposed to GLP-1 RAs. Subsequently, and in contrast, several American gastroenterology associations, societies and the American College of G
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Short-acting GLP-1 RAs produce a more pronounced delay in gastric emptying than long-acting agents.
“In general, short-acting agents produce a more pronounced delay in gastric emptying than long-acting agents [3, 15].”
From Delayed gastric emptying induced by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and its implications for perioperative risk during anesthesia (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
The discussion of gastric-emptying studies reports that short-acting lixisenatide delayed gastric emptying while longer-acting liraglutide and dulaglutide did not in one small study. But it says the difference between short- and long-acting formulations is only 'purported,' notes that the longer-acting drugs were tested at relatively low doses, and cites few large studies. The claim presents that qualified evidence as a general fact. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Raven, L. M., Brown, C., & Greenfield, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU)
- St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Raven, Lisa M
- Venue
- Medical Journal of Australia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-11-27
- Volume
- 220
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-16
- ISSN
- 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
- 1326-5377
- OpenAlex
- W4389069945
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Keywords
- GLP-1 receptor agonists, delayed gastric emptying, perioperative care, liraglutide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, lixisenatide, gastrointestinal adverse effects, nausea and vomiting, type 2 diabetes, obesity, weight loss, cardiovascular benefits, adverse drug reactions
- MeSH terms
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Gastroparesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review