Cited by 29Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screeningmelanin and skin pigmentation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Changes in the incidence of melanoma in Australia, 2006–2021, by age group and ancestry: a modelling study

Open access
Whiteman, David C, Neale, Rachel E, Baade, Peter, Olsen, Catherine M, Pandeya, Nirmala·2024·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the incidence of melanoma in Australia among people with ancestries associated with low, moderate, or high risk of melanoma, by sex and 5‐year age group; to establish whether age‐specific incidence rates by ancestry risk group have changed over time. Study design: Modelling study; United States (SEER database) melanoma incidence rates for representative ancestral populations and Australian census data (2006, 2011, 2016, 2021) used to estimate Australian melanoma incidence rates by ancestry‐based risk. Setting, participants: Australia, 2006–2021. Main outcome measures: Age‐specific invasive melanoma incidence rates, and average annual percentage change (AAPC) in age‐specific melanoma rates, by ancestry‐based risk group, sex, and 5‐year age group. Results: The proportion of people in Australia who reported high risk (European) ancestry declined from 85.3% in 2006 to 71.1% in 2021. The estimated age‐standardised melanoma incidence rate was higher for people with high risk ancestry (2021: males, 82.2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 80.5–83.8] cases per 100 000 population; females, 58.5 [95% CI, 57.0–59.9] cases per 100 000 population) than for all Australians (males, 67.8 [95% CI, 66.5–69.2] cases per 100 000 population; females, 45.4 [95% CI, 44.3–46.5] cases per 100 000 population). AAPCs were consistently positive for Australians aged 50 years or older, both overall and for people with high risk ancestry, but were statistically significant only for some age groups beyond 65 years. AAPCs were negative for people aged 34 years or younger, but were generally not statistically significant. Conclusions: Melanoma incidence has declined in some younger age groups in Australia, including among people with high risk ancestry. Social and behavioural changes over the same period that lead to lower levels of ultraviolet radiation exposure probably contributed to these changes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/mja2.52404

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0160 · DOI
  2. 10.1096/fj.201701472R · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jid.2016.01.035 · DOI
  4. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1956.tb36084.x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(71)91246-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/ijc.2910260602 · DOI
  7. Walker H, 2022, Forty years of Slip! Slop! Slap! A call to action on skin cancer prevention for Australia, Public Health Res Pract, 32, 10.17061/phrp31452117 · DOI
  8. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002932 · DOI
  9. 10.2217/mmt.14.6 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jid.2018.12.006 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102321 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0190-9622(00)90183-X · DOI
  13. 10.2340/00015555-1877 · DOI
  14. 10.2340/00015555-1983 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/ijc.31348 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/ijc.31347 · DOI
  17. 10.3322/caac.21492 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Anderson RN, 1998, Age standardization of death rates: implementation of the year 2000 standard, Natl Vital Stat Rep, 47, 20
  19. Yang L, 2019, Trends in sedentary behavior among the US population, 2001–2016, JAMA, 321, 10.1001/jama.2019.3636 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.exer.2013.04.018 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/519276a · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.12.018 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.08.022 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100024 · DOI
  25. 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.302 · DOI
  26. 10.1186/s12885-016-2747-6 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2012.05713.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Whiteman, D. C., Neale, R. E., Baade, P., Olsen, C. M., & Pandeya, N.
Affiliations
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Brisbane QLD
  • Cancer Council Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Whiteman, David C
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-09
Volume
221
Issue
5
Pages
251-257
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W4402111151
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 2
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1185416, APP1155413)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
age-specific incidence, European ancestry, UV exposure, incidence trends, sex differences, young adults, Australia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Australia, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Skin Neoplasms, Incidence, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, White People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review