The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 22 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Posthuman Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel'
Open accessAbstract
burlesque comedy 'Zum groen Wurstel', a wrestler, wearing a panther skin and medals, emerges from the audience.1 His entrance onto the stage of the Marionettentheater [marionette theatre] interrupts the ongoing play. He wrestles with the Duke, a marionette and male hero figure. In a short fight the well-known fairground type, who proudly exhibits his abnormal physique, is defeated by a puppet seemingly controlled by strings. The Duke casually throws the wrestler back into the now-agitated audience.2 The scene is disturbing
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
85 Own interpretation · 25 No basis given · 22 Sources not found · 13 Not checked yet · 5 Own result
In the paper
“Taken by surprise at the power of his play in performance, Schnitzler described the encounter between the real and fictive audience of the 1912 staging of 'Zum großen Wurstel' as a 'veritable [n] Skandal' [veritable scandal, Tb, 12.2.1912].”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Tb, 12.2.1912
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Feminist theorist Karen Barad criticizes reflexivity as iterative mimesis which 'emphasises sameness and separateness'.24”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Barad
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Retrospectively, Schnitzler linked his dramatic experiments with his eminently undramatic world-view.He argues that his rejection of conventional drama motivates his choice of highly stylized genres 'wo Grenzen a priori gegeben -' [where boundaries are given a priori -, Tb, 4.7.1910].”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Tb, 4.7.1910
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Schnitzler's choice to animate puppetry for the conventional theatre stage is mainly informed by his fury at commentators who claimed that he was only interested in 'Lieb' und Spiel und Tod' [love and play and death] and that all his characters were variations on Anatol, the sweet girl or the demonic woman.13”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Schnitzler, Buch der Sprüche und Bedenken. Aphorismen und Fragmente (Vienna, 1927), p. 26.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Simultaneously it re-enacts the genealogy of Schnitzler's writing process in that the text of the Raisonneur was subject to major cuts throughout the creative process for 'Zum großen Wurstel'”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The manner in which Schnitzler made his revisions and cuts on the handannotated copy, frequently crossing out entire pages several times, suggests that he may indeed have changed the text during the rehearsals.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
hedgedconditionalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Scenes of on-stage editing provide crucial insights about embodiment and human and nonhuman forms of agency because they delineate particular practices through which the dramatic text and the performance are mutually constituted by the audience and the other elements of the theatrical apparatus.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 141
- It may state two separate claims as one. 37
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the frequent changes in genre, the overall thematic structure remained intact throughout the genesis of the play.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Schnitzler's human puppets would wear make-up to look like puppets and would move like puppets.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet the commentator puppet reappears on the stage again in the subsequent scene.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alongside the human string puppets, Schnitzler also sought to blur boundaries between members of the real audience and fictional characters by”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“He detailed how to produce the illusion of human puppets in the stage directions (see WUR_K3_T4_0013).”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not only are the three characters controlled by the extremely ritualized conventions of the duel but they are also intricately entangled in multiple love triangles.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the prelude to 'Zum großen Wurstel'the most substantial in Schnitzler's cycle of three one-act puppet plays, Marionetten [Marionettes, 1906], also comprising 'Der Puppenspieler' [The Puppeteer] and 'Der tapfere Cassian' [Gallant Cassian]the Theatre Director announces the irrevocable redundancy or even death of conventional theatre.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most striking change, which went hand in hand with the transformation into a puppet play and a verse drama, is the performance technique that Schnitzler used.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Schnitzler's main idea was for the puppets to be played by actors suspended by visible wires on the stage.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Glücksmann's suggestion seems to have been to include Schnitzler's famous character Anatol and his lovers in the play, an idea that Schnitzler rejected.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“He reworked the stage design between July 1900 and August 1904, adapting the stage setting of Ludwig Tieck's Der gestiefelte Kater [Puss in Boots, 1797].”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He could not help but comment on a report which disclosed that the real audience had mistaken their fictive counterpart for fellow spectators, interacting directly with the actors on the intermediate stage.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With regard to the trio of puppet plays, it is 'Zum großen Wurstel' for which Schnitzler made the most substantial changes.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the aforementioned revolt of the marionettes it is the Raisonneur and his fellow puppets who stress the Poet's lack of agency: 'Marionetten.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The Poet attempts to maintain artistic agency by responding: 'Das ist die schönste Stelle!' [That's the best part! WUR, 120].”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The latter is not at a loss for criticism when the Raisonneur resumes his commentary: 'Ja, warum haben S' ihm denn das nicht g'strichen?' [Well, why didn't you cut that bit for him?WUR, 120].”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Schnitzler in fact strengthened their roles.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a way similar to his fictive counterpart, he made further cuts to the lines of the Raisonneur but did not remove him entirely.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Schnitzler himself suggested in a letter to Glücksmann that he could update these two literary characters by drawing on more recent plays.32”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He worked closely with Glücksmann and with Leopold Kramer, who ultimately directed the puppet plays.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, when he returned to the play for the first joint staging of the Marionetten in Vienna on 10 February 1912, his reworking was characterized by extensive cuts which, similar to the practice of the Poet figure that he had created in autumn 1904, he seems to have performed on stage during rehearsals.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Changes to the text at this point particularly concern the dialogue between the Director and Poet (see WUR_DH1_0111).”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“He, in turn, pointed out to Glücksmann that his best ideas would emerge during the rehearsals.33”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Towards the end of the play the marionettes define their emancipatory agency through particular human skills: 'Die Marionetten.Ei, nun tun wir, was wir wollen!/ Reden, singen, tanzen, tollen!' [The Marionettes.Hey, now we can do just what we want!/ We talk, we sing, we dance, we romp!', WUR, 146].”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Schnitzler attended rehearsals for all three plays, which started on 29 January 1912 and lasted two weeks.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The Director's second response to the Poet's suggestion to instantly cut a few lines of the Raisonneur's speech also gains another line in Schnitzler's hand.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Over the course of the creative process Schnitzler increasingly emphasizes different ways of embodying and enacting his experience with audience A.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After the Theatre Director has pointed out that he had suggested cutting the commentator puppet altogether, he voices a telling piece of criticism.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His cuts are recorded quite expressively in his hand-annotated copy.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > References
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the end of the play the Unknown Man, a mysterious figure, enters the stage and cuts the wires of the marionettes.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most of the pages of the book are annotated in Schnitzler's hand, with different degrees of engagement.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > References
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In blocking the scene in which the marionettes rebel another case of boundary-crossing became clear to me.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
boosteddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The author's practical experience of co-directing the play at Cambridge University Library in April 2019 is a valid source of evidence about the play's entangled embodiment.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Schnitzler largely acted on Glücksmann's advice but did not follow it entirely.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > References
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The entangled embodiment of the audience became even more evident through my practical experience of co-directing the play at Cambridge University Library in April 2019.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The author's practical experience of co-directing the play at Cambridge University Library in April 2019 is a valid source of evidence about the play's entangled embodiment.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reworking 'Zum großen Wurstel' for the 1912 production, Schnitzler revises the cutting scene and the feedback loop it created in audience B in several other ways.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He completely removed the two anti-illusionist literary characters, Der Meister, sourced from Hermann Bahr's comedy of the same title, and Der Graf von Charolais, the title”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > References
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Schnitzler's letters to Glücksmann indicate that the latter proposed in this staging to remove from audience B two characters who were actually the title figures of recent plays by his friends Hermann Bahr and Richard Beer-Hofmann.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > References
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While Fischer-Lichte's performative aesthetics help to conceptualize the agency of the real audience in theatrical performance, their reliance on reflexivity and representation obscures our view of the theatrical apparatus and investigative subject or, in this case, the other agents who are collaboratively pulling the strings.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The defeat of the wrestler by a para-human character not only raises questions about the ways in which bodies and meaning are generated on the theatrical stage but also emphasizes the troubled issue of agency, mechanical behaviour and free will.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I will argue that the dramatic interaction between intermediate stage B and stage Cthe puppet theatre with the supposed string puppetsembodies and enacts the mental conjectures and cognitive patterns of audience A, the bourgeois theatre-going audience, in dialogue with Schnitzler's own criticism of the audience, his critics and his creative process.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Alys George has associated Vienna's famous Wurstelprater amusement park with Tony Bennett's idea of the 'exhibitionary complex', identifying the Wurstelprater around 1900 as a 'contact zone' that served as a spectacle to educate the masses about human anatomy.6”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites George, 'Anatomy for All: Medical Knowledge on the Fairground in Finde-Siècle Vienna', Central European History, 51 (2018), 535-62 (p.540).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Schnitzler's comedy resonates with both claims.It specifically draws attention to its experimental conditions by incorporating characters who are usually excluded from the stage, such as the author and the theatre director, as well as a fictive audience which is placed centre-stage.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Schnitzler experiments with dramatic setting in a way that parallels this narrative technique by embodying the real audience by an interior play-within-a-play structure.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Barad's feminist and agential realist framework underlines the importance of including experimental conditions in the analysis of the 'production of bodies and meaning'.9”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Barad, Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Durham, NC, and London, 2007), p. 73.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The return of the Raisonneur who acts against the Poet's ruling calls into question the authority of the master puppeteer and emphasizes the morethan-human agency of the audience.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this way Schnitzler places his puppet cycle in the tradition of animating a new form of theatre.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the same time, the wrestling match questions how far the practice of the audience is determined and embodied by mechanical or selfdetermined behaviour.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In her material realist account of posthuman performativity Barad draws on quantum physics and feminist theory.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Human puppets had previously been explored by the French symbolists, most obviously in Alfred Jarry's Ubu Roi [King Ubu, 1896].14”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bosse, 'Depersonalisierung des Schauspielers. Zentrales Movens eines plurimedialen Theaters in Moderne und Avantgarden'
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this way, the play sheds light on how agency emerges, particularly when the pre-existing boundaries of puppet theatre are crossed.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The focus here is on boundaries between humans and machines as well as subject and object, which contributed to the comedy's reputation as perhaps the most radical of Schnitzler's dramatic experiments.7”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The marionette was frequently used in romanticism, symbolism and up to modernism as an experimental tool for '[die] Neubegründung des Theaters' [the new foundation of theatre] that would overcome illusionist and bourgeois aesthetics.4”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nelle, 'Marionette', p. 190.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As will be shown, the framing action parodies audience A, and the tragicomedy on stage C embodies their expectations.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This tendency to perpetuate the same dichotomies is vital in the given context, as Schnitzler's 'lebende[s] Kasperltheater' [living Punch and Judy show, WUR_BT1_0007] crucially challenges pre-existing hierarchical binaries between human and machine through an intentional act of exclusion that fails.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Agential cuts bring into view the mutual constitution of entangled agencies, particularly in relation to nonhuman agents.25”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Barad, 'Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart', Parallax, 20.3 (2014), 169-87 (p.168).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the three plays, it is Schnitzler's 'Wurstelspaß' which reconfigures the subversive Hanswurst character in ways that create the most extreme form of meta-theatrical parody in his œuvre.5”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Intra-actions enact agential cuts by 'a (re)configuring of patterns of differentiating-entangling' rather than by absolute separations or a prescribed set of patterns.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this way the Poet's pantomimic gesture is potentially transformative for audiences A and B because it also refers to the spectators' own bodies and addresses them as objects embodied in this scene.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast to a negative use of the marionette, which stresses the loss of free will and the loss of agency, Schnitzler's cycle of one-act plays puts string puppets to work more creatively.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Crossing onto the stage area, the Poet's verbal deletion of the commentator character acts as a form of whispered message, passed on from character to character to audience, who are prompted to reflect upon this unsettling gesture that brings forth the human in the theatrical machinery.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Thus, her approach emphasizes exclusions that are equally significant on a conceptual level.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Puppet-like convention and experimental border-crossing are thus entwined.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Barad defines the 'apparatus' as boundary-making practices which 'cut up the world in particular ways that necessarily and inevitably exclude possible alternatives'.11”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Barad, Meeting the Universe Halfway
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Here I will solely concentrate on Barad's key concept of intra-activity or the movement of 'cutting together-apart', which she uses to explicate the idea of the agential cut as a coming together and emerging from this differently.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By reducing the lines of the commentator puppet, the Poet aims to silence his critics in the audience too.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A diffractive reading of Schnitzler's hybrid performance technique demonstrates that the boundaries and discursive practices which are constituted in the play are real in that they intra-actively produce the material realities of the audience.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“She proposes 'a posthumanist understanding of the human in that it defines human embodiment as an enactment of particular human concepts'.26”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Barad, Meeting the Universe Halfway, p. 160.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scene between the Poet and the Director on the one hand emphasizes what the character of the Unknown Man later identifies as the invisible strings of the on-stage audience by revealing the external and institutional pressures that come to bear on both characters”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet the play constantly reconfigures the theatrical machinery by questioning the agencies of those who are supposedly pulling the strings.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As demonstrated in the Wrestler scene, Schnitzler's comedy complicates human and other-than-human agency through material entanglements and intraactions which reconfigure the boundaries between the agents in the play.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
boosteddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Raisonneur puppet as commentator is reconfigured from being an instrument of the theatrical apparatus to an object of observation and subsequently embodies human agency through his return to the stage.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As mentioned above, the new form of theatre, the entangled embodiment and interior play-within-a-play structure which Schnitzler created in 'Zum großen Wurstel', emerges most clearly through his practice of reworking the play.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
boosteddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, a diffractive reading of his burlesque comedy reveals a much subtler and potentially more subversive practice by creating a theatrical event that fundamentally unsettles the boundaries between theatrical world and reality, speaking far more to post-Brechtian, postdramatic theatre practice, which emphasizes bodily activity and its obstruction and entanglements of reality and fiction.35”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The emancipatory act of the marionettes reconstitutes their bodily borders by cutting them away from the puppeteer.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Poet's move onto the puppet stage complicates the human/nonhuman dichotomy and exhibits the phenomenal body of the performer of the commentator figure.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is this entangled relationship between human and nonhuman forms of agency that marks the way in which the fictive Director and Poet respond to the Raisonneur, as Schnitzler's human marionettes take control of the play.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Fischer-Lichte identifies agency which is created through theatrical gesture as being potentially manipulative.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This agential cut enacts a boundary-making practice that humorously puts forward particular human concepts and transforms the marionettes into human agents.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, the cutting scene shows the emergence of the material reality of a performance which is directly shaped by critics from audience B and stage C.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the Raisonneur comes on stage again, despite orders to the contrary, the actor's disobedience enacts yet another agential cut which, in turn, transforms the supposed puppeteer, controlling him as an object of observation.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Besides the role reversal which highlights the material body of the actor who is impersonating a marionette, the Poet's practice enacts an agential cut which ultimately changes his creation's bodily boundaries by cutting the string puppet away from the fictive measuring apparatus.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, in the final version he incorporated his experience as a member of audience B into the role of the Poet”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Through their human practices of free play, the visible wires of the puppets are understood to be part of their 'subject' and human agency.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Fischer-Lichte analysed theatre and performance art in the 1960s and identified four different strategies for generating corporeality.Two of them, 'reversing the relationship between the performer and their role' and exhibiting the materiality of the individual performer's body, are relevant in this context.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With the coarseness of the play Schnitzler was mainly referring to the bare physicality of the wrestling scene.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In this way, members of the audience are not only invited to become 'Schöpfer eines neuen Sinns' [creators of a new meaning] but also challenge the subject/object dichotomy.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [22]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the other hand, it shows how the Poet attempts to cut the text of the Raisonneur, who is controlled by visible strings.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This dramatic experiment produces scenes wherein boundary-making practices are challenged by frequent border crossings between real audience A, fictive audience B and the hybrid puppet theatre.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“examining the movement patterns of the agents on stage helps us to understand the pulling of the strings, whether the puppeteer happens to be Schnitzler, the Poet or indeed members of the audience.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The deletion marks seem to trace his thinking process.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
hedgedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the one hand the strings configure his status as a para-human agent whose comments are directed by a set of pre-existing expectations, on the other they can be read as a transfiguration of the highly stylized semiotic body and language of the Raisonneur, whose satirical rhymes imitate commentary as a cognitive mechanism.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The role of the latter is highly ambivalent as he constantly interrupts and objectifies the play by summarizing the ongoing action.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, the Poet's physical intervention in the text-cutting scene turns the commentator puppet into an object of observation.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His border crossing and pantomimic gesture of whispering in the commentator's ear embody the responses of the audience B and its role as co-creator of the theatrical event.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Raisonneur's disobedience, in turn, emphasizes the 'puppet-like' character of the Poet.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Fischer-Lichte's performative approach focuses on how the tension between semiotic and phenomenal body generates corporeality in performance through different processes of embodiment and informs the way in which the audience perceives materiality on stage.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It enacts boundary-making practices that constantly shift between subject and object and incorporate mechanical concepts into subjects.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Poet in fact also seeks to break free from his close ties to the audience, and the mediating figure of the Director.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, it reveals the Poet's own anti-illusionist practice by showing that he does not literally pull the strings.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Poet's intervention brings about a role reversal by interacting with the actor's body and excluding part of their semiotic body by cutting some lines.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet he went well beyond Tieck's dramatic model by placing the Hanswurst figure among human actors who are physically attached to wires which seem to manipulate their movement and actions.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Looking again at the cutting scene, the Poet's gesture of saying something in the ear of the Raisonneur puppet reverses the relationship between actor and role.It directs the audience's attention to the individual material body of the human actor who plays a marionette.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“What we can observe here is indeed a scene of on-stage editing by the author figure.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“According to her posthumanist approach human subjects in fact remain disembodied.27”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites ibid., p. 154.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Processes of embodiment require interpretation on the part of the audience too.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“My diffractive reading of the real apparatus responds to Barad's argument that the investigative subject needs to be included in the analysis to understand the diffraction pattern.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Fischer-Lichte's notion of embodiment departs from Helmuth Plessner's distinction between the phenomenal and the semiotic body in that it radically questions the underlying two-world theory which perpetuates the body/mind dichotomy.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His decision to include more characters needs to be understood in the context of his criticism of the aforementioned first staging of the puppet play in March 1901, in which he participated by playing the non-speaking role of a visitor to the amusement park.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this way they confirmed the materiality and power of the reality produced by the theatrical event and, by extension, by the return of the puppet in Schnitzler's multifaceted theatrical apparatus.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Poet's physical intervention also draws attention to the visible strings by which the Raisonneur is suspended.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His practice is reminiscent of the Poet's scene of on-stage editing in the play.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interestingly, the way in which the real director and the real author responded to the theatrical apparatus in the context of the staging of 'Zum großen Wurstel' at the Deutsches Volkstheater in Vienna in 1912 constituted a similar diffraction pattern to the intra-action of the fictive Director and Poet.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Barad's discussion of the idea of 'intra-action' through agential cuts explains how bodily boundaries are produced.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Barad posits that a so-called 'diffraction pattern', resulting from the meeting of two waves, or the encounter between agentsthe Poet and Director for example, is instigated by the 'diffraction apparatus'.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Erika Fischer-Lichte's redefinition of the term embodiment brings into focus the two key strategies of how agency and the body's materiality are created in the cutting scene.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Poet's despair seems to echo Schnitzler's own criticism of the audience which attended the 1901 production in Berlin.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Poet also emphasizes the human agency of the puppet by talking to the actor.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“acts of boundary crossing, in both spatial and conceptual terms, shed light on the entangled relationshipthe crossing of visible and invisible stringsbetween human and non-human agencies.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And the performance practice in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' provides an excellent example of the co-constitution of human and non-human boundaries.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
boostedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Poet's physical interference and his attempt to diminish the role of the Raisonneur draw attention to bodily gesture.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence Barad questions whether human subjects can be enacted.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, the cutting scene constitutes multiple agential cuts, which demonstrate that the 'line between subject and object is not fixed'.28”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And the Director, in turn, favours the physicality of the Wrestler's body as more apt to seduce the audience.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Via criticism of the haughtiness of the Poet and of the timing of his cuts, the Director increasingly takes on the role of the commentator.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The wrestling scene re-enacts a crucial parameter of the theatrical world that Schnitzler's play re-creates and parodies through grotesque bodily practices.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The key binaries which are challenged in the play are those between humans and machines, and subjects and objects, as well as between the theatrical world and the realities that emerge in the play.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The human actors who are seemingly controlled by strings present the 'puppet-like' aspect of audience A.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And the disobedience of the Raisonneur shows that the actors are in fact their own puppeteers too.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Despite the Wrestler's emergence from audience B this scene exposes the fact that he actually belongs to the personnel of the marionette theatre (see WUR, 99).”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites WUR, 99
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yet what emerges in Schnitzler's dramatic experiment is a new form of posthuman and audience-led theatre: it rejects essentialist ideas about human-ness by showing the intricate entanglement of human and nonhuman forms of agency through transformative bodily gestures that also address the material body of the audience.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The same can, in turn, be said of the Director and the Poet, particularly the latter who repeatedly places himself on the stage of the puppet theatre and is mainly directed by the audience.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Just as the wrestling match turns out to be a scene in which two marionettes were fighting with each other, Schnitzler's parody of the reception of his work also reveals the mechanics of his creative process.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although these annotations are undated, his correspondence with Glücksmann about the changes to 'Zum großen Wurstel' suggests that they relate to the 1912 staging.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > References
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though the Wrestler was situated in audience B he needed to collapse to the ground together with his fellow marionettes.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His additions to the cutting scene at this point also shift the boundaries of the real and fictive theatrical apparatus in at least two different ways.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This exchange between director Glücksmann and poet Schnitzler, in which both seem to imitate their fictive counterparts, can be read as a reconfiguration of the cutting scene in the play, particularly as Schnitzler consciously acts in character in another letter to theatre director Otto Brahm on 15 February 1912.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > References
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 'Zum großen Wurstel' these boundary-making practices are enacted when crucial demarcation lines are deliberately crossed.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, the scene with the Wrestler demonstrates a parallel entanglement of human and nonhuman agency, and of apparatus and audience.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
boostedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Director's remarks allude to Schnitzler's initial comments on the audience's lack of understanding of the staging in Berlin in 1901 by implying that it was the Poet who had lost sight of the plot.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If we look at the Poet and the Director as two characters who each drop a stone in a pond and consider how their waves or responses co-create a pattern of effects, the diffraction pattern which emerges through their intra-actions is shaped through constant re-configurations of ontological boundaries.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Audiences A and B are both embodied through nonhuman agency in 'Zum großen Wurstel', not least through the visible strings that symbolize their stereotypical expectations and mechanical behaviour.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this way Schnitzler performs a role reversal which puts forward and adapts the criticism of the real poet in the play.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His practice creates a diffraction pattern of two human marionettes wrestling with each other, which constantly re-configures human and nonhuman boundaries.”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper relies on this without support.
The author's practical experience of co-directing the play at Cambridge University Library in April 2019 is a valid source of evidence about the play's entangled embodiment.
“The entangled embodiment of the audience became even more evident through my practical experience of co-directing the play at Cambridge University Library in April 2019.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
“Parallax, 20.3 (2014), 169-87”
§ Wrestling with Marionettes: Entangled Embodiment and Post-Human Agency in Schnitzler's 'Zum großen Wurstel' > IV
“(p.168).”
Citations
Cites
Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning
Barad, K. (2006) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv12101zq · Cited by 10,472
Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart
Barad, K. (2014) · Parallax · doi:10.1080/13534645.2014.927623 · Cited by 1,491
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [1]1. Arthur Schnitzler's personal copy of Marionetten.29 Most of the pages of the book are annotated in Schnitzler's hand, with different degrees of engagement. Although these annotations are undated, his correspondence with Glücksmann about the changes to 'Zum großen Wurstel' suggests that they relate to the 1912 staging. Schnitzler's letters to Glücksmann indicate that the latter proposed in this staging to remove from audience B two characters who were actually the title figures of recent plays by his friends Hermann Bahr and Richard Beer-Hofmann. In his letter to Glücksmann, Schnitzler concluded: 'Den "Grafen von Charolais" und den "Meister" werden wir also streichen' [We will cut the 'Count of Charolais' and the 'Master' then].30
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marionetten. Drei Einakter (1906)
Bayerdörfer, H.-P. (2022) · J.B. Metzler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-05919-2_31
Metadata
- Authors
- Neumann
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Neumann
- Venue
- Austrian Studies
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 163
- ISSN
- 1350-7532 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3003152040
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Austrian Studies (publishedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo
- Funders
- Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/L001683/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › German Literature and Culture Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Theatre and Performance Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Modernist Literature and Criticism
- Keywords
- Arthur Schnitzler, marionette theatre, puppetry, burlesque comedy, Mr. Punch, Hanswurst
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-02, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-02 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
