The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of pre-slaughter fasting time on weight loss, meat quality and carcass contamination in broilers
Open accessAbstract
Objective: An experiment was conducted to determine the appropriate fasting time prior to slaughter for broilers in floor-feed and scatter-feed mode.Methods: On 21 d since hatching, 120 Arbor Acres broilers were divided into floor-feed and scatter-feed groups, chicks from each group were further assigned to feed withdrawal treatments for 0, 4, 6, 8, and 10 h. Some resultant indicators such as carcass contamination, body weight loss, meat quality of 54-day-old broilers were measured.Results: It appears that longer feed withdrawal increased weight loss, lightness, drop loss of meat but reduced pH. A significant higher weight loss and lightness for both floor-feed and scatter-feed chicks coincided after 6 to 10 h feed withdrawal (p<0.05). pH for breast muscle at 45 min postmortem reduced when chicks of scatter-feed were fasted 6 and 10 h, while the reduction of floor-feed group occurred only in 10 h (p<0.05). A noticeable effect of feed withdrawal on drop loss occurred after 10 h fasting in scatter-feed of which drop loss were significantly higher than that for other groups including control (p<0.05). The change of contamination propensity revealed that 6 to 10 h fasting significantly reduced the likelihood of carcass contamination under both floor-feed and scatter-feed (p<0.05). Net weights of intestinal contents for gizzard were significantly reduced after feed deprived for 10 h in floor-feed and 6 and 10 h in scatter-feed (p<0.05). The decrease for whole intestine occurred after floor-feed broilers have been without feed for more than 4 h, scatter-feed broilers for more than 8 h (p<0.05).Conclusion: On the premise that poultry product properties and welfare were not significantly damaged, proper fasting time could reduce carcass contamination. Current data implied that 6 h fasting was recommendable for both floor and scatter feed pre-slaughter broilers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Feed withdrawal 6 to 10 h before slaughter reduces the feed content in the digestive tract.This helps prevent gut contents spillage during carcass evisceration and contamination during processing (Xue et al., 2021).”
From Food safety and hygiene knowledge, attitudes and practices in street restaurants selling chicken in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso (2024) · cites this paper as Xue et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1139/cjas-2017-0076 · DOI
- Brizio, 2015, Visible contamination in broiler carcasses and its relation to the stages of evisceration in poultry slaughter, 59
- Tougan, 2016, Influence of feed withdrawal length on carcass traits and technological quality of indigenous chicken meat reared under traditional system in Benin, 48
- Warriss, 1990, Time spent by broiler chickens in transit to processing plants, 617
- 10.3382/ps.2013-03444 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.09.011 · DOI
- 10.3382/ps/pey432 · DOI
- 10.1093/ps/84.7.1146 · DOI
- 10.3382/ps/pez181 · DOI
- 10.1080/09712119.2018.1509004 · DOI
- 10.1093/japr/13.2.171 · DOI
- Abdullah, 2014, Effect of different periods of feed withdrawal before slaughtering in two broiler strains on meat quality, 21
- 10.1017/S0043933910000024 · DOI
- 10.5713/ajas.2007.106 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cbpb.2015.04.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.04.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.261 · DOI
- 10.1093/japr/3.2.103 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.05.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.11.033 · DOI
- 10.1002/jsfa.2740580118 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.08.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fshw.2018.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107941 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.01.054 · DOI
- 10.3382/ps/peu040 · DOI
- 10.1590/S1516-635X2013000200007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.11.006 · DOI
- 10.1088/1755-1315/102/1/012051 · DOI
- 10.1093/ps/82.8.1326 · DOI
- 10.1093/ps/86.6.1241 · DOI
- 10.1590/S0103-84782008000200028 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gemeda, B. A., Dione, M., Ilboudo, G., Assefa, A., Lallogo, V., Grace, D., & Knight-Jones, T. J. D. (2024) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2024.1448127 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Xue, G., Cheng, S., Yin, J., Zhang, R., Su, Y., Li, X., Li, J., & Bao, J.
- Affiliations
- Northeast Agricultural University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Jianhong
- Bao, Jun
- Venue
- Animal Bioscience
- Published
- 2021-06-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1070-1077
- ISSN
- 2765-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 2765-0235
- PMC
- PMC8100496
- OpenAlex
- W3095905052
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Animal Bioscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772647)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- pre-slaughter fasting, broiler chickens, feed withdrawal, carcass contamination, meat quality, weight loss, intestinal contents, poultry welfare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of pre-slaughter fasting time on weight loss, meat quality and carcass contamination in broilers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5713/ajas.20.0560
- The paper
- Xue, G., Cheng, S., Yin, J., Zhang, R., Su, Y., Li, X., Li, J., & Bao, J. (2021). Influence of pre-slaughter fasting time on weight loss, meat quality and carcass contamination in broilers. Animal Bioscience. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0560