Cited by 19

Container Closure Integrity Testing—Practical Aspects and Approaches in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Brown, Helen, Mahler, Hanns-Christian, Mellman, James, Nieto, Alejandra, Wagner, Daniel, Schaar, Matthias, Mathaes, Roman, Kossinna, Juergen +5 more·2017·PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Abstract

The assurance of sterility of a parenteral drug product, prior to any human use, is a regulatory requirement. Hence, all strategies related to container closure integrity (CCI) must demonstrate absence of microbial contamination through leaks as part of the container closure system (CCS) qualification, during manufacturing, for quality control purposes and to ensure microbiological integrity (sterility) during storage and shipment up to the end of product shelf life. Current regulatory guidances, which differ between countries and regions, provide limited detail on how to assess CCI. The new revision of USP aims to provide extensive and detailed guidance for CCI assessments for sterile products. However, practical questions and considerations are yet to be addressed by the pharmaceutical industry. These may include: (1) choice of method, for example whether a deterministic CCI method (e.g., helium leak) is preferable over the probabilistic CCI method (e.g., microbial ingress), (2) the type of primary packaging (e.g., vial, syringe, device), (3) dosage form (e.g., liquid versus lyophilisate), (4) suitable acceptance criteria, (5) appropriate sample size, (6) the most appropriate way to introduce artificial leaks into the CCS, (7) ensuring suitable assurance of CCI during drug product manufacturing, and (8) evaluating CCI under intended shipment and storage conditions (e.g., in the frozen state).A group of European industry peers have met to discuss these and other related ques…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5731/pdajpst.2016.006999

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Laser-drilled holes are considered to be the most practical and controllable among various methods for creating artificial leaks in thin films and membranes and have often been used for this purpose.

    “While “real-world” defects can encompass a variety of forms, laser-drilled holes are considered to be the most practical and controllable among various methods for creating artificial leaks in thin films and membranes and have often been used for this purpose [11,16,17,20,30,31].”

Cited by

Authors
Brown, H., Mahler, H.-C., Mellman, J., Nieto, A., Wagner, D., Schaar, M., Mathaes, R., Kossinna, J., Schmitting, F., Dreher, S., Roehl, H., Hemminger, M., & Wuchner, K.
Venue
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Published
2016-10-27
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
147-162
ISSN
  • 1079-7440
  • 1948-2124
Cited by
19
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review