Container Closure Integrity Testing—Practical Aspects and Approaches in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Abstract
The assurance of sterility of a parenteral drug product, prior to any human use, is a regulatory requirement. Hence, all strategies related to container closure integrity (CCI) must demonstrate absence of microbial contamination through leaks as part of the container closure system (CCS) qualification, during manufacturing, for quality control purposes and to ensure microbiological integrity (sterility) during storage and shipment up to the end of product shelf life. Current regulatory guidances, which differ between countries and regions, provide limited detail on how to assess CCI. The new revision of USP aims to provide extensive and detailed guidance for CCI assessments for sterile products. However, practical questions and considerations are yet to be addressed by the pharmaceutical industry. These may include: (1) choice of method, for example whether a deterministic CCI method (e.g., helium leak) is preferable over the probabilistic CCI method (e.g., microbial ingress), (2) the type of primary packaging (e.g., vial, syringe, device), (3) dosage form (e.g., liquid versus lyophilisate), (4) suitable acceptance criteria, (5) appropriate sample size, (6) the most appropriate way to introduce artificial leaks into the CCS, (7) ensuring suitable assurance of CCI during drug product manufacturing, and (8) evaluating CCI under intended shipment and storage conditions (e.g., in the frozen state).A group of European industry peers have met to discuss these and other related ques…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Laser-drilled holes are considered to be the most practical and controllable among various methods for creating artificial leaks in thin films and membranes and have often been used for this purpose.
“While “real-world” defects can encompass a variety of forms, laser-drilled holes are considered to be the most practical and controllable among various methods for creating artificial leaks in thin films and membranes and have often been used for this purpose [11,16,17,20,30,31].”
From Defect Detection Sensitivity of Bubble-Point-Type Tests for Sterilizing-Grade Membrane Cartridge Filters (2023) · cites this paper as [30]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Giglia, S., Alembath, A., & Hersey, J. (2023) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes13010088 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brown, H., Mahler, H.-C., Mellman, J., Nieto, A., Wagner, D., Schaar, M., Mathaes, R., Kossinna, J., Schmitting, F., Dreher, S., Roehl, H., Hemminger, M., & Wuchner, K.
- Venue
- PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.
- Published
- 2016-10-27
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-162
- ISSN
- 1079-7440
- 1948-2124
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review