Application of Recombinant Factor C Reagent for the Detection of Bacterial Endotoxins in Pharmaceutical Products
Abstract
Recombinant Factor C (rFC) is non-animal-derived reagent used to detect bacterial endotoxins in pharmaceutical products. Despite the fact that the reagent was first commercially available nearly 15 years ago, the broad use of rFC in pharmaceutical industry has long been lagging, presumably due to historical single-source supplier concerns and the lack of inclusion in worldwide pharmacopeias. Commercial rFC reagents are now available from multiple manufacturers, thus single sourcing is no longer an issue. We report here the successful validation of several pharmaceutical products by an end-point florescence-based endotoxin method using the rFC reagent. The method is equivalent or superior to the compendia bacterial endotoxins test method. Based on the comparability data and extenuating circumstances, the incorporation of the end point fluorescence technique and rFC reagent in global compendia bacterial endotoxins test chapters is desired and warranted. LAY ABSTRACT: Public health has been protected for over 30 years with the use of a purified blood product of the horseshoe crab, limulus amebocyte lysate. More recently, this blood product can be produced in biotech manufacturing processes, which reduces potential impacts to the horseshoe crab and related species dependent upon the crab, for example, migrating shorebirds. The pharmaceutical industry has been slow to adopt the use of this reagent, Recombinant Factor C (rFC), for various reasons. We evaluated the use of rFC across…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rFC assay can help overcome some limitations of traditional LAL testing, particularly regarding sensitivity in complex matrices.
“The rFC assay can help overcome some limitations of traditional LAL testing, particularly regarding sensitivity in complex matrices.”
From Harmonisation of quality control tests for academic production of CAR-T cells: a position paper from the WP-bioproduction of the UNITC consortium (2025) · cites this paper as [26]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Bolden, J., & Smith, K.
- Affiliations
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Bolden, Jay
- Venue
- PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 405-412
- ISSN
- 1079-7440 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-2124
- OpenAlex
- W2738102896
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
- Keywords
- bacterial endotoxin, endotoxin testing, pharmaceutical products, Limulus amebocyte lysate, comparability, pharmaceutical supply chain
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Drug Industry, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Endotoxins, Enzyme Precursors, Humans, Indicators and Reagents, Limulus Test, Recombinant Proteins, Serine Endopeptidases, Animal Use Alternatives, Arthropod Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review