Cited by 1

Single-Use System Integrity I: Using a Microbial Ingress Test Method to Determine the Maximum Allowable Leakage Limit (MALL)

Aliaskarisohi, Saeedeh, Hogreve, Marc, Langlois, Carole, Cutting, Jonathan, Barbaroux, Magali, Cappia, Jean-Marc, Menier, Marie-Christine·2019·PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Abstract

An aerosol microbial ingress test was specifically designed and used to create a predictive model in order to determine the maximum allowable leakage limit (MALL) of single-use systems (SUSs). The MALL is defined as the greatest leak size that does not pose any risk to the product. The procedure involved taking test samples of film material from single-use bags. As test samples, an ethylene vinyl acetate multilayer film (300 μm thick) and a polyethylene multilayer film (400 μm thick) were cut into 50 mm patches. Artificial defects of 1-100 µm were laser-drilled in the middle of each film patch. The patch was assembled on a holder and properly sealed. The test units were filled aseptically with culture media and placed inside an aerosol chamber. Various pressures were applied to the test unit to simulate the constraints that single-use systems may be subject to under real-world conditions. After an aerosolization cycle with spores of Bacillus atrophaeus , a minimum concentration of 10 6 CFU/cm 2 was reached on the film surface. The test units were incubated for 14 days at 30°C-35°C and visually inspected for bacterial ingress. Thirty samples per defect size were tested. Logistic regression was used to indicate the MALL for a single-use system according to the required risk level. With this method, the probability of the occurrence or absence of ingress for a specific defect size was reported according to the experimental data. In addition to physical parameters, such as the pr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5731/pdajpst.2018.009688

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Laser-drilled holes are considered to be the most practical and controllable among various methods for creating artificial leaks in thin films and membranes and have often been used for this purpose.

    “While “real-world” defects can encompass a variety of forms, laser-drilled holes are considered to be the most practical and controllable among various methods for creating artificial leaks in thin films and membranes and have often been used for this purpose [11,16,17,20,30,31].”

Cited by

Authors
Aliaskarisohi, S., Hogreve, M., Langlois, C., Cutting, J., Barbaroux, M., Cappia, J.-M., & Menier, M.-C.
Venue
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Published
2019
Volume
73
Issue
5
Pages
459-469
ISSN
  • 1079-7440
  • 1948-2124
Cited by
1
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review