Test Process and Results of Potential Masking of Sterilizing-Grade Filters
Abstract
Pre-use/post-sterilization integrity testing (PUPSIT) has been a widely debated topic for the last several years. To a large extent, the debate is because of the fact that scientific data were not available to provide additional clarity that could inform appropriate risk-based judgements and commensurate actions. To gain clarity, the Parenteral Drug Association (PDA) and BioPhorum Organizations Group (BioPhorum) formed the Sterile Filtration Quality Risk Management (SFQRM) consortium in late 2017. The consortium goals have been to fill existing gaps in scientific data as adequately as possible with studies and industry guidance that would provide professionals and license holders with the ability to make informed decisions about appropriate risk-management strategies. This paper is one in a series of publications that are the result of the collaboration, and these should be considered together and viewed holistically in order to determine the best course of action with regard to PUPSIT. In total, the four papers cover the following areas: (1) data mining to determine the influence of fluid properties on integrity test values, (2) filter masking studies and results (this publication), (3) risk assessment and management from filter production to end use, and (4) points to consider in the best practice of the use of PUPSIT. In total, 25 manufacturers and filter suppliers have contributed to the work of the Consortium, deploying their filtration experts and pooling their collecti…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Important factors when performing a process risk assessment are the chance of a present filter damage being masked and whether the process fluid can plug and thereby mask this damage.
“Important factors when performing a process risk assessment are the chance of a present filter damage being masked and whether the process fluid can plug and thereby mask this damage (Ferrante et al. 2020).”
From Single-use solutions for PUPSIT: requirements, challenges, and solutions (2026) · cites this paper as Ferrante et al. 2020
Laser-drilled holes are considered to be the most practical and controllable among various methods for creating artificial leaks in thin films and membranes and have often been used for this purpose.
“While “real-world” defects can encompass a variety of forms, laser-drilled holes are considered to be the most practical and controllable among various methods for creating artificial leaks in thin films and membranes and have often been used for this purpose [11,16,17,20,30,31].”
From Defect Detection Sensitivity of Bubble-Point-Type Tests for Sterilizing-Grade Membrane Cartridge Filters (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In many cases, including in some recent studies pertaining to filter integrity testing, a bubble point test is the only test used to assess the integrity of a filter.
“However, in many cases, including in some recent studies pertaining to filter integrity testing, a bubble point test is the only test used to assess the integrity of a filter [20,21].”
From Defect Detection Sensitivity of Bubble-Point-Type Tests for Sterilizing-Grade Membrane Cartridge Filters (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Giglia, S., Alembath, A., & Hersey, J. (2023) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes13010088 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Single-use solutions for PUPSIT: requirements, challenges, and solutions
Glenz, M., Eiermann, P., Manser, B., & Teschner, H. (2026) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-026-13847-5 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ferrante, S., McBurnie, L., Dixit, M., Joseph, B., & Jornitz, M.
- Venue
- PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 509-523
- ISSN
- 1079-7440
- 1948-2124
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review