Cited by 4Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyHealthcare RegulationPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

Pharmaceutical manufacturing in the EU and the EU–US mutual recognition agreement

Gaspar Ernesto, LÍgia Maria, Dias Loureiro, Rui Miguel·2020·PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry is one of the most competitive sectors in Europe and has a strong presence in many European Union (EU) countries. The mutual recognition agreement (MRA) for inspections of medicines manufacturers between the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the EU started by the end of 2017 and gradually extended to all EU member states (MSs) in July 2019. We quantified the number of FDA and EU good manufacturing practice (GMP) inspections carried out in each other's territory between 2009 and 2018. The five EU MSs with the largest number of FDA inspections were Germany, followed by Italy, France, the United Kingdom (UK), and Spain. All of them, with the exception of Germany, were included in the group of the first eight EU MSs recognized by the FDA in the context of the MRA. In 2018, these five EU MSs were within the top 10 EU exporters of pharmaceutical products to the US. Four of these five EU MSs (Italy, Germany, France, and the UK) accounted for 53.4% of the total pharmaceutical production in the EU in 2018. We also studied the type of manufacturing operations covered by the manufacturer's authorizations issued by each EU MS for the manufacturers within its territory. We verified a high prevalence of conventional technology versus complex technology manufacturing for many EU countries. Going forward, this unbalance should be addressed at a national and EU level. Supporting for instance (bio)pharmaceutical manufacturing through pharma p…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.011437

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For CRISPR-Cas technology, there is extensive evidence on potential off-target effects when introducing mutations in undesired genomic loci, and induction of host immune responses upon administration.

    “Especially for CRISPR-Cas technology, there is extensive evidence on potential off-target effects when introducing mutations in undesired genomic loci (142), and induction of host immune responses upon administration (143).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 3 · Cited by 4

Authors
Gaspar Ernesto, L. M., & Dias Loureiro, R. M.
Venue
PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Published
2020
Volume
74
Issue
6
Pages
617-626
ISSN
  • 1079-7440 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-2124
OpenAlex
W3035678087
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
mutual recognition agreements, pharmaceutical manufacturing, pharmaceutical industry competitiveness, regulatory harmonization
MeSH terms
Biological Products, Drug Industry, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Economic Competition, European Union, Humans, International Cooperation, Sterilization, Technology, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review