A Risk Assessment and Risk Based Approach Review of Pre-use/Post Sterilization Integrity Testing (PUPSIT)
Abstract
In January 2023, ICHQ9 was updated to include expanded guidance on risk-based decision-making, emphasizing its application in informing science-driven and strategic decisions. The revised guidance highlights that while quality risk management can aid decision-making, it does not eliminate the industry's obligation to comply with regulatory requirements. This article introduces a framework for evaluating the risks and benefits of pre-use/post-sterilization integrity testing (PUPSIT) using risk management principles. It provides a structured approach to assess the acceptability of alternative methods to the EU Annex 1 PUPSIT requirement, which acknowledges that PUPSIT may not always be feasible due to constraints such as the filtration of small solution volumes. In such cases, Annex 1 permits alternative approaches if a comprehensive risk assessment is conducted and effective controls are implemented to mitigate the risk of non-integral filtration systems. The proposed framework considers three critical domainspatient safety, process integrity, and regulatory complianceto ensure decisions are well-informed and balanced. By applying this science- and risk-based approach, organizations can navigate PUPSIT requirements effectively, ensuring compliance while addressing operational limitations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pressure-decay testing pressurizes the assembly and observes loss of pressure over time; semi-automated systems have improved sensitivity and consistency, making this method widely applicable in routine operations.
“One of the most practical options for IT is pressure‑decay testing, in which the assembly is pressurized and observed for any loss of pressure over time; semi‑automated systems have improved both sensitivity and consistency, making this method widely applicable in routine operations (Waldron et al. 2025).”
From Single-use solutions for PUPSIT: requirements, challenges, and solutions (2026) · cites this paper as Waldron et al. 2025
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Single-use solutions for PUPSIT: requirements, challenges, and solutions
Glenz, M., Eiermann, P., Manser, B., & Teschner, H. (2026) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-026-13847-5 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Waldron, K., McFarland, A., Baseman, H., & Jornitz, M.
- Venue
- PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Parenteral Drug Association, Inc.
- Published
- 2025-02-10
- Pages
- pdajpst.2024-003038
- ISSN
- 1079-7440
- 1948-2124
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review