How to Make Models Add Up — A Primer on GLMMs
Abstract
Many problems in the analysis of ecological data have the format where there is an observed response that may be predicted by several covariates. Although the response can take several forms (e.g. measurements, counts, observations of presence/absence), and the covariates can also vary (e.g. be measurements themselves, or be grouped according to the treatment applied, the time or location of of sampling, etc.), most of these problems can be handled in a single framework, the Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM). The framework encompasses regression, ANOVA, generalized linear models, and equivalent models with random as well as fixed effects. Here, the different parts of the GLMM are described, building from regression and ANOVA to show how the extra components — the wider range of distributions, and random effects — can be added into the same framework, and how the parameters of the fitted model can be estimated and interpreted. Being able to handle data with GLMMs helps ecologists to analyse the majority of their data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent advances make it possible to fit generalized linear mixed models with a variety of error distributions or to use randomization techniques such as bootstrapping.
“Recent advances in statistical modeling appear to have solved this problem, because it is now possible to fit generalized linear mixed models “glmm” with a variety of error distributions (e.g., binomial, Poisson, zero-inflated Poisson, negative binomial; Harrison et al., 2018; O'Hara, 2009) or to use a range of randomization techniques such as bootstrapping (Good, 2005)”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as O'Hara, 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 99
- Authors
- O'Hara, R. B.
- Venue
- Annales Zoologici Fennici
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 124-137
- ISSN
- 0003-455X (ISSN-L)
- 1797-2450
- OpenAlex
- W2157372322
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annales Zoologici Fennici (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- generalized linear mixed models, random effects, fixed effects, ecological data analysis, count data, presence-absence data, model interpretation, parameter estimation, regression analysis, analysis of variance, generalized linear models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review