Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Determination of Ash in Animal Feed: AOAC Official Method 942.05 Revisited

Open access
Thiex, Nancy, Novotny, Lawrence, Crawford, Andy·2012·Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL

Abstract

AOAc Official MethodSM 942.05, Ash in Animal Feed, has been applied in feed laboratories since its publication in the Official Methods of Analysis in 1942. it is a routine test with renewed interest due to the incorporation of “ash values” into modern equations for the estimation of energy content of dairy feed, beef feed, and pet food. As with other empirical methods, results obtained are a function of the test conditions. For this method, the critical conditions are the ignition time, ignition temperature, and any other furnace or weighing conditions. complete ignition can be observed by the absence of black color (due to residual carbonaceous material) in the ash residue. to investigate performance of AOAc 942.05, 15 samples were chosen to be representative of a wide range of feed materials. these materials were tested at the conditions of AOAc 942.05 (ignition at 600°c for 2 h) and similar or more rigorous conditions. the additional conditions investigated included: 600°c for 4 h; 600°c for 2 h, cool, and ignite 2 additional h; 600°c for 2 h, cool, wet, dry, and ignite 2 additional h; 550°c for 6 h; 550°c for 3 h, cool, and ignite 3 additional h; and 550°c for 3 h, cool, wet, dry, ignite 3 additional h. results for all other conditions investigated were found to be significantly different from the current AOAc Method 942.05. All ignition conditions were significantly different from each other except two: 550°c for 3 h, cool, ignite 3 additional h; and 550°c for 3 h, cool, wet, dry, and ignite 3 additional h. recommendations for modification to AOAc Official Method 942.05 are suggested based on statistical analysis of the data and a review of the literature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5740/jaoacint.12-129

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Thiex, N., Novotny, L., & Crawford, A.
Venue
Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL
Published
2012-09-01
Volume
95
Issue
5
Pages
1392-1397
ISSN
  • 1060-3271 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7922
OpenAlex
W2077488713
Cited by
331
References
0
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of Ash in Animal Feed: AOAC Official Method 942.05 Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5740/jaoacint.12-129
The paper
Thiex, N., Novotny, L., & Crawford, A. (2012). Determination of Ash in Animal Feed: AOAC Official Method 942.05 Revisited. Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.12-129

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.