The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determination of Ash in Animal Feed: AOAC Official Method 942.05 Revisited
Open accessAbstract
AOAc Official MethodSM 942.05, Ash in Animal Feed, has been applied in feed laboratories since its publication in the Official Methods of Analysis in 1942. it is a routine test with renewed interest due to the incorporation of “ash values” into modern equations for the estimation of energy content of dairy feed, beef feed, and pet food. As with other empirical methods, results obtained are a function of the test conditions. For this method, the critical conditions are the ignition time, ignition temperature, and any other furnace or weighing conditions. complete ignition can be observed by the absence of black color (due to residual carbonaceous material) in the ash residue. to investigate performance of AOAc 942.05, 15 samples were chosen to be representative of a wide range of feed materials. these materials were tested at the conditions of AOAc 942.05 (ignition at 600°c for 2 h) and similar or more rigorous conditions. the additional conditions investigated included: 600°c for 4 h; 600°c for 2 h, cool, and ignite 2 additional h; 600°c for 2 h, cool, wet, dry, and ignite 2 additional h; 550°c for 6 h; 550°c for 3 h, cool, and ignite 3 additional h; and 550°c for 3 h, cool, wet, dry, ignite 3 additional h. results for all other conditions investigated were found to be significantly different from the current AOAc Method 942.05. All ignition conditions were significantly different from each other except two: 550°c for 3 h, cool, ignite 3 additional h; and 550°c for 3 h, cool, wet, dry, and ignite 3 additional h. recommendations for modification to AOAc Official Method 942.05 are suggested based on statistical analysis of the data and a review of the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
León-González, M. E., Gómez-Mejía, E., Rosales-Conrado, N., & Madrid-Albarrán, Y. (2018) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.141 · Cited by 55
Emkani, M., Moundanga, S., Oliete, B., & Saurel, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2023.1284413 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Thiex, N., Novotny, L., & Crawford, A.
- Venue
- Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-09-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1392-1397
- ISSN
- 1060-3271 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7922
- OpenAlex
- W2077488713
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of Ash in Animal Feed: AOAC Official Method 942.05 Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5740/jaoacint.12-129
- The paper
- Thiex, N., Novotny, L., & Crawford, A. (2012). Determination of Ash in Animal Feed: AOAC Official Method 942.05 Revisited. Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.12-129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.