Cited by 58Vitamin D Research StudiesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation

Baseline Assessment of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Assay Performance: A Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) Interlaboratory Comparison Study

Wise, Stephen A, Phinney, Karen W, Tai, Susan S-C, Camara, Johanna E, Myers, Gary L, Durazo-Arvizu, Ramon, Tian, Lu, Hoofnagle, Andrew N +32 more·2017·Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL

Abstract

The Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) coordinated an interlaboratory study to assess the comparability of measurements of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] in human serum, which is the primary marker of vitamin D status. A set of 50 individual donor samples were analyzed by 15 different laboratoriesrepresenting national nutrition surveys, assay manufacturers, and clinical and/or research laboratories to provide results for total 25(OH)D using both immunoassays (IAs) and LC tandem MS (MS/MS). The resultswere evaluated relative to bias compared with the target values assigned based on a combination of measurements at Ghent University (Belgium) and the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology using reference measurement procedures for the determination of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3. CV and mean bias for each laboratory and assay platform were assessed and compared with previously established VDSP performance criteria, namely CV ≤ 10% and mean bias ≤ 5%. Nearly all LC-MS/MS results achieved VDSP criteria, whereas only 50% of IAs met the criterion for a ≤10% CV and only three of eight IAs achieved the ≤5% bias. These results establish a benchmark for the evaluation of 25(OH)D assay performance and standardization activities in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5740/jaoacint.17-0258

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wise, S. A., Phinney, K. W., Tai, S. S.-C., Camara, J. E., Myers, G. L., Durazo-Arvizu, R., Tian, L., Hoofnagle, A. N., Bachmann, L. M., Young, I. S., Pettit, J., Caldwell, G., Liu, A., Brooks, S. P. J., Sarafin, K., Thamm, M., Mensink, G. B. M., Busch, M., Rabenberg, M., Cashman, K. D., Kiely, M., Kinsella, M., Galvin, K., Zhang, J. Y., Oh, K., Lee, S.-W., Jung, C. L., Cox, L., Goldberg, G., Guberg, K., Prentice, A., Carter, G. D., Jones, J., Brannon, P. M., Lucas, R. M., Crump, P. M., Cavalier, E., Merkel, J., Betz, J. M., & Sempos, C. T.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine, Smyrna, GA, USA
  • Loyola University Chicago, Department of Public Health Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA
  • Stanford University, Department of Health Research and Policy Biostatistics, Palo Alto, CA, USA
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (AU)
  • Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology (AU)
  • Health Canada (CA)
  • Robert Koch Institute (DE)
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KR)
  • Neodin Medical Institute, Seoul, Korea
  • MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory (GB)
  • Charing Cross Hospital (GB)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Liège (BE)
Corresponding author
Wise, Stephen A
Venue
Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL
Published
2017-09-01
Volume
100
Issue
5
Pages
1244-1252
ISSN
  • 1060-3271 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7922
OpenAlex
W2748086777
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of AOAC International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Keywords
25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D status, assay performance, interlaboratory comparison, immunoassay, LC-MS/MS, measurement bias, coefficient of variation, reference measurement procedure, vitamin D2, vitamin D3, human serum
MeSH terms
Blood Chemical Analysis, Chromatography, Liquid, Humans, Immunoassay, Reference Standards, Vitamin D, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review