The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Archaeological Heritage Resource Protection in Canada
Abstract
This chapter reviews the historical development and current legislative framework of archaeological heritage resource protection in Canada. This chapter takes into account the founding of the Western Canadian Archaeological Council in 1960 as the Canadian legislation to protect archaeological heritage resources was woefully inadequate prior to the 1960s, and archaeologists urgently needed to find ways to protect and preserve the diminishing record of this legislation. This chapter highlights several initiatives taken by Canada towards heritage resource protection. It concludes that if there is to be effective archaeological heritage preservation legislation at all government levels in Canada, it is crucial that government, archaeologists, and Aboriginal people recognize and respect the validity of each other's values. They must acknowledge the differences and find common ground to achieve what is essentially the same underlying objective for all concerned.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Until very recently, non-Indigenous scholars often considered Indigenous peoples objects of study, and archaeological practices typically prevented descendant communities from ownership of their past, and from knowledge making about their ancestors (Atalay 2006;Pokotylo and Mason 2010).”
From What We See, What We Don’t See: Data Governance, Archaeological Spatial Databases and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in an Age of Big Data (2020) · cites this paper as Pokotylo and Mason 2010
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gupta, N., Blair, S., & Nicholas, R. (2020) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00934690.2020.1713969 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Pokotylo, D., & Mason, A. R.
- Venue
- Cultural Heritage Management
- Publisher
- University Press of Florida
- Published
- 2010-06-01
- Pages
- 48-69
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Archaeological Heritage Resource Protection in Canada. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5744/florida/9780813034607.003.0005
- The paper
- Pokotylo, D., & Mason, A. R. (2010). Archaeological Heritage Resource Protection in Canada. Cultural Heritage Management. https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9780813034607.003.0005
