The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Are the Digital Humanities So White? or Thinking the Histories of Race and Computation
Abstract
This chapter argues that the difficulties encountered in knitting together discussions of race with technological productions within the digital humanities (or in studies of code) are an effect of the very designs of our technological systems—designs that emerged in post-World War II computational culture. These origins of the digital continue to haunt scholarly engagements with computers, underwriting the ease with which we partition off considerations of race in our work in digital humanities and digital media studies. The chapter draws analogies between shifting racial and political formations and the emerging structures of digital computing in the late 1960s to highlight the ways in which the organization of information and capital in the 1960s responds—across many registers—to the struggles for racial justice and democracy that so categorized the United States at the time.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Walker and Winders astutely write that the creators of AI 'capitalize on the doom and gloom they helped produce', and which is based upon a now famous 'origin story' claimed by AI's predominantly white, cisgender male 'creators' (see also McPherson 2012).”
From A Reply on Responsibility and Repair in AI : Lessons From Outer Space, Agriculture and Gay Hookup Apps (2026) · cites this paper as McPherson 2012
Citations
Cites
Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet
Turkle, S. (1997) · Cited by 6,329
Manovich, L. (2002) · Canadian Journal of Communication · doi:10.22230/cjc.2002v27n1a1280 · Cited by 4,184
Sandoval, C. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9780816687107 · Cited by 2,421
Turner, F. (2006) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226817439.001.0001 · Cited by 1,861
Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology
Bender, T. K., & Landow, G. P. (1992) · Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature · doi:10.2307/1347143 · Cited by 1,077
Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization
Galloway, A. R. (2004) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 944
Racial Formation in the United States from the 1960s to the 1980s, by Michael Omi and Howard Winant
Hamilton, C. V. (1988) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2151151 · Cited by 816
Ross, K. (2002) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226728001.001.0001 · Cited by 737
Keeling, K. K. (2007) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822390145 · Cited by 730
You are not a gadget: a manifesto
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5602 · Cited by 596
Cited by
Stevens, N., & Gieseking, J. J. (2026) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.70046 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mcpherson, T.
- Venue
- Debates in the Digital Humanities
- Publisher
- University of Minnesota Press
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- Pages
- 139-160
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 20
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.