The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Challenges and solutions in speech-language pathology service delivery across Australia and Canada
Open accessAbstract
Background, aims and objectives: This study aimed to compare the perception of barriers to service delivery among speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in Canada and Australia and the extent to which they used parent or carer training to overcome these barriers. Methods: Participants were 81 Australian and 63 Canadian SLPs who completed an online survey. Questions comprised open ended and forced choice questions with some ranking of questions also required. Chi-square analyses were conducted comparing Canadian and Australian SLPs. Results: Few differences existed among the respondents. Respondents overwhelmingly selected “not enough speech-language pathology positions to meet demand” as their main barrier. This barrier along with “parents/carer’s lack of knowledge about the need for speech-language pathology”, “lack of parent/carer engagement” and “lack of awareness of role of speech-language pathologist” were the principal barriers. Training parents and carers to conduct therapy at home was the most used strategy among both Canadian and Australian SLPs. Discussion: The finding that the SLPs perceive low engagement from parents both in the training sessions and when working with their child may suggest that there is a need for speech-language pathologists to determine more effective ways to train and engage parents and carers. Conclusion: More research into the efficacy of parent or carer training across a wider range of speech-language pathology practice areas and across a mor…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Limited access to practitioners who can provide clinical diagnoses based on LSA outcomes due to costs and poor availability in areas where service does not meet community demand can further drive inequity and discrimination.
“Moreover, limited access to practitioners who can provide clinical diagnoses based on LSA outcomes (e.g., Speech-Language Pathologists [SLPs]) due to costs and poor availability in areas where service does not meet community demand (Lim et al., 2017; McAllister et al., 2011) can further drive inequity and discrimination (O'Callaghan et al., 2005; Verdon et al., 2011).”
From Early Identification of Language Disorders Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning: Challenges and Emerging Approaches (2025) · cites this paper as Lim et al., 2017
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lammert, J. M., Roberts, A. C., McRae, K., Batterink, L. J., & Butler, B. E. (2025) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2024_jslhr-24-00515 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, J., McCabe, P., & Purcell, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare
- Publisher
- University of Buckingham Press
- Published
- 2017-05-23
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120
- ISSN
- 2052-5648 (ISSN-L)
- 2052-5656
- OpenAlex
- W2619465219
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Journal for Person Centered Healthcare (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
- Keywords
- barriers to service delivery, home-based therapy, parental involvement, workforce shortage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review