Scope and precision of sustainability assessment approaches to food systems
Open accessAbstract
Schader, C., J. Grenz, M. S. Meier, and M. Stolze. 2014. Scope and precision of sustainability assessment approaches to food systems. Ecology and Society 19(3): 42. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06866-190342
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reviews of sustainability assessment frameworks usually conclude that there is no one-size-fits-all solution.
“Reviews of sustainability assessment frameworks usually conclude that there is no one-size-fits-all solution (Schader et al., 2014)”
From Assessing Transitions to Sustainable Agricultural and Food Systems: A Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation (TAPE) (2020) · cites this paper as Schader et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 286
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Binder, C., A. Wiek, and M. Fenchel 2001. Sustainability spaces: a new concept to evaluate development using indicator systems. Pages 33-34 in The science & culture of industrial ecology: abstracts from the inaugural meeting (Netherlands, 12-14 November 2001). International Society for Industrial Ecology, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
- Foley, J. A., N. Ramankutty, K. A. Brauman, E. S. Cassidy, J. S. Gerber, M. Johnston, N. D. Mueller, C. O'Connell, D. K. Ray, P. C. West, C. Balzer, E. M. Bennett, S. R. Carpenter, J. Hill, C. Ecology and Society 19(3): 42 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss3/art42/
- Julius, C., C. Moller, B. Osterburg, and S. Sieber. 2003. Indicators for a sustainable land use in the "Regionalised Agricultural and Environmental Information System for Germany" (RAUMIS). Agrarwirtschaft 52(4):184-194.
- Marchand, F., L. Debruyne, and L. Lauwers. 2012. A comparison of complex expert-based assessments versus quickscan assessment. In Proceedings of the 10th European International Farming Systems Association (IFSA) Symposium (Aarhus, Denmark, 1-4 July 2012). IFSA Europe Group, Vienna, Austria.
- Authors
- Schader, C., Grenz, J., Meier, M. S., & Stolze, M.
- Affiliations
- Forschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau (CH)
- Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH)
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999924709
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 17.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Ecology and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ARBOR - Bern University of Applied Sciences Repository (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Digital Library Of The Commons Repository (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
- Keywords
- sustainability assessment, food systems, sustainability indicators, food system sustainability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
