CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The curious case of eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica stock status in Apalachicola Bay, Florida

Pine III, William E., Walters, Carl J., Camp, Edward V., Bouchillon, Rachel, Ahrens, Robert, Sturmer, Leslie, Berrigan, Mark E.·2015·Ecology and Society
DOI 10.5751/es-07827-200346
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5751/es-07827-200346

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 2 Time line of key events and management actions in the Apalachicola Bay, Florida oyster fishery, 1836-2013.
Fig. 2 Time line of key events and management actions in the Apalachicola Bay, Florida oyster fishery, 1836-2013.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Reported Apalachicola Bay, Florida oyster fishing license holders (a), annual oyster fishing trips (b), average catch per trip from 1986-2012 (c), reported oyster fishery landings (d), and amount of cultch (shell) material planted in Apalachicola Bay as a restoration tool from 1880-2012 (e). Prior to 1986, landings data were reported under a voluntary reporting system (red verticle line in panel d). From 1986 to the present, landings and effort were tracked via the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Trip Ticket Program.
Fig. 3 Reported Apalachicola Bay, Florida oyster fishing license holders (a), annual oyster fishing trips (b), average catch per trip from 1986-2012 (c), reported oyster fishery landings (d), and amount of cultch (shell) material planted in Apalachicola Bay as a restoration tool from 1880-2012 (e). Prior to 1986, landings data were reported under a voluntary reporting system (red verticle line in panel d). From 1986 to the present, landings and effort were tracked via the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Trip Ticket Program.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure A2.1. Monthly relative recruitment (a) and growth patterns (b) assumed for oysters in Apalachicola Bay, Florida based on empirical assessment of growth patterns and literature review.
Figure A2.1. Monthly relative recruitment (a) and growth patterns (b) assumed for oysters in Apalachicola Bay, Florida based on empirical assessment of growth patterns and literature review.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure A2.2. Density dependence in relative catchability q as evidenced by variation in mean annual catch per unit effort (CPUE), measured as trips per year divided by mean legal oyster density from DACS surveys. Assuming constant area swept per tong lift, this relationship implies that number of tong lifts per trip increases by a factor of about 4 when densities drop from around 100 legal oysters/m 2 to the observed low of near 10/m 2 .
Figure A2.2. Density dependence in relative catchability q as evidenced by variation in mean annual catch per unit effort (CPUE), measured as trips per year divided by mean legal oyster density from DACS surveys. Assuming constant area swept per tong lift, this relationship implies that number of tong lifts per trip increases by a factor of about 4 when densities drop from around 100 legal oysters/m 2 to the observed low of near 10/m 2 .CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure A2.3. Observed (black circles) and model predicted (blue line) trends in legal (> 76.2 mm, panel (a) and sub-legal (b) oyster abundance, predicted oyster fishery yield (c), and estimated natural mortality rate (d) in Apalachicola Bay from 1990-2013. Model prediction results are from applying the parameter estimation procedure assuming balanced impacts of variation in natural mortality rate and recruitment rate. Observed data are from Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Sciences (DACS) fisheries independent surveys and predictions are from age-structured model described in this paper for comparison. Note large reduction in recruitment rates for 2012-3 implied by forcing the model to fit the DACS density estimates.
Figure A2.3. Observed (black circles) and model predicted (blue line) trends in legal (> 76.2 mm, panel (a) and sub-legal (b) oyster abundance, predicted oyster fishery yield (c), and estimated natural mortality rate (d) in Apalachicola Bay from 1990-2013. Model prediction results are from applying the parameter estimation procedure assuming balanced impacts of variation in natural mortality rate and recruitment rate. Observed data are from Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Sciences (DACS) fisheries independent surveys and predictions are from age-structured model described in this paper for comparison. Note large reduction in recruitment rates for 2012-3 implied by forcing the model to fit the DACS density estimates.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure A2.4. Comparison of model-predicted length proportions of legal sized oysters in Apalachicola Bay, Florida during fall (blue line) and observed length proportions of legal size oysters (black circles) in fisheries independent surveys conducted in fall by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
Figure A2.4. Comparison of model-predicted length proportions of legal sized oysters in Apalachicola Bay, Florida during fall (blue line) and observed length proportions of legal size oysters (black circles) in fisheries independent surveys conducted in fall by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure A2.5. Comparison of model predicted length proportions of oysters 15-105 mm in size from Apalachicola Bay, Florida during fall (blue line) and observed length proportions of legal size oysters (black circles) from fisheries independent surveys conducted in fall by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
Figure A2.5. Comparison of model predicted length proportions of oysters 15-105 mm in size from Apalachicola Bay, Florida during fall (blue line) and observed length proportions of legal size oysters (black circles) from fisheries independent surveys conducted in fall by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Andree, S., editor. 1983. Apalachicola oyster industry: conference proceedings. Report No. 57. University of Florida Sea Grant Program, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  2. Beck, M. W., R. D. Brumbaugh, L. Airoldi, A. Carranza, L. D. Coen, C. Crawford, O. Defeo, G. J. Edgar, B. Hancock, M. C. Kay, H. S. Lenihan, M. W. Luckenbach, C. L. Toropova, G. F. Zhang, and X. M. Guo. 2011. Oyster reefs at risk and recommendations for conservation, restoration, and management. BioScience 61:107-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.2. · DOI
  3. Berrigan, M. E. 1990. Biological and economical assessment of an oyster resource development project in Apalachicola Bay, Florida. Journal of Shellfish Research 9:149-158.
  4. Borsje, B. W., B. K. van Wesenbeeck, F. Dekker, P. Paalvast, T. J. Bouma, M. M. van Katwijk, and M. B. de Vries. 2011. How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection. Ecological Engineering 37:113-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.027 · DOI
  5. Camp, E. V., W. E. Pine III, K. Havens, A. S. Kane, C. J. Walters, T. Irani, A. B. Lindsey, and J. G. Morris. 2015. Collapse of a historic oyster fishery: diagnosing causes and identifying paths toward increased resilience. Ecology and Society 20(3):45. http:// dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07821-200345 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Coen, L. D., R. D. Brumbaugh, D. Bushek, R. Grizzle, M. W. Luckenbach, M. H. Posey, S. P. Powers, and S. G. Tolley. 2007. Ecosystem services related to oyster restoration. Marine Ecology Progress Series 341:303-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps341303 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dugas, R. J., E. A. Joyce, and M. E. Berrigan. 1997. History and status of the oyster, Crassostrea virginica, and other molluscan fisheries of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Pages 187-210 in C. L. MacKenzie, Jr., V. G. Burrell, Jr., A. Rosenfield, and W. L. Hobart, editors. The history, present condition, and future of the molluscan fisheries of North and Central America and Europe. Volume 1: Atlantic and Gulf Coasts. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 127.
  8. Hayes, P. F., and R. W. Menzel. 1981. The reproductive cycle of early setting Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin) in the northern Gulf of Mexico, and its implications for population recruitment. Biological Bulletin 160:80-88. Ecology and Society 20(3): 46 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol20/iss3/art46/
  9. Livingston, R. J. 1991. Historical relationships between research and resource management in the Apalachicola River estuary. Ecological Applications 1:361-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1941897 · DOI
  10. Livingston, R. J. 2002. Trophic organization in coastal systems. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/978 1420040852 · DOI
  11. Livingston, R. J., X. Niu, F. G. Lewis, III, and G. C. Woodsum. 1997. Freshwater input to a gulf estuary: long-term control of trophic organization. Ecological Applications 7:277-299. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0277:FITAGE]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  12. MacKenzie, C. L. 1996. History of oystering in the United States and Canada, featuring the eight greatest oyster estuaries. Marine Fisheries Review 58:1-78.
  13. Petes, L. E., A. J. Brown, and C. R. Knight. 2012. Impacts of upstream drought and water withdrawals on the health and survival of downstream estuarine oyster populations. Ecology and Evolution 2:1712-1724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.291 · DOI
  14. Seavey, J. R., W. E. Pine III, P. Frederick, L. Sturmer, and M. Berrigan. 2011. Decadal changes in oyster reefs in the Big Bend of Florida's Gulf Coast. Ecosphere 2:art114. http://dx.doi. org/10.1890/es11-00205. · DOI
  15. Swift, F. 1898. The oyster-grounds of the west Florida coast: their extent, conditions, and peculiarities. Pages 185-187 in Proceedings and Papers of the National Fishery Congress, Tampa, Florida, January 19-24, 1898.
  16. Turner, R. E. 2006. Will lowering estuarine salinity increase Gulf of Mexico oyster landings? Estuaries and Coasts 29(3):345-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02784984 · DOI
  17. Twichell, D., L. Edmiston, B. Andrews, W. Stevenson, J. Donoghue, R. Poore, and L. Osterman. 2010. Geologic controls on the recent evolution of oyster reefs in Apalachicola Bay and St. George Sound, Florida. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 88:385-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2010.04.019 · DOI
  18. Whitfield, W. K., Jr., and D. S. Beaumariage. 1977. Shellfish management in Apalachicola Bay: past-present-future. Pages 130-140 in R. J. Livingston and E. A. Joyce, Jr., editors. Proceedings of the Conference on the Apalachicola Drainage System. Florida Marine Resource Publication No. 26. Florida Department of Natural Resources, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
  19. Wilber, D. H. 1992. Associations between freshwater inflows and oyster productivity in Apalachicola Bay, Florida. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 35:179-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ s0272-7714(05)80112-x · DOI
  20. Wilberg, M. J., M. E. Livings, J. S. Barkman, B. T. Morris, and J. M. Robinson. 2011. Overfishing, disease, habitat loss, and potential extirpation of oysters in upper Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 436:131-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/ meps09161 Table A2.2a-d. Estimates of raw and interpolated mean oyster density (number/m 2 ) for sublegal (20-75 mm shell length) and legal (> 75 mm) oysters from Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services surveys on major oyster bars in Apalachicola Bay. (a) Raw mean oyster density (number/m 2 ) for sublegal oysters Cat Point Dry Bar East Hole Eleven Mile Bar Lighthouse Bar Normans South Platform Bar Porters Bar 1990 267.4 166.0 108.1 1991 220.2 257.4 158.7 244.8 340.9 1992 274.9 242.0 237.1 315.6 502.4 1993 237.5 151.8 333.4 246.0 298.0 140.8 1994 287.7 305.4 525.2 132.1 214.9 332.8 152.9 1995 180.7 216.8 721.4 119.6 256.8 344.9 1996 341.6 225.4 293.8 516.9 430.8 1997 377.7 122.7 460.8 106.4 360.4 329.2 1998 191.7 105.8 174.1 317.2 320.4 1999 244.3 562.8 443.6 246.0 192.1 2000 379.1 199.6 332.8 2001 266.1 516.8 415.2 138.4 2002 286.4 412.8 211.6 62.5 85.2 2003 353.7 283.2 167.2 164.8 184.8 2004 681.7 144.1 685.8 40.0 657.4 2005 180.3 119.7 184.0 92.9 2006 178.0 500.4 124.4 462.4 42.5 2007 350.5 618.4 158.8 253.6 168.0 2008 148.6 418.6 198.6 200.2 170.0 189.1 256.4 253.3 2009 154.1 261.9 186.1 169.5 229.7 172.7 2010 172.1 242.3 247.2 139.9 309.2 224.1 439.7 2011 587.9 401.2 297.6 2012 48.5 80.0 34.5 194.9 219.6 · DOI
  21. Andree, S., editor. 1983. Apalachicola oyster industry: Conference proceedings. University of Florida Sea Grant Program, Report No. 57, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  22. Hayes, P. F., and R. W. Menzel. 1981. The reproductive cycle of early setting Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin) in the northern Gulf of Mexico, and its implications for population recruitment. The Biological Bulletin 160:80-88.
  23. Ingle, R. M., and C. E. Dawson, Jr. 1952. Growth of the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin) in Florida waters. Bulletin of Marine Science 2:393-404.
  24. Swift, F. 1898. The oyster-grounds of the west Florida coast: Their extent, conditions, and peculiarities. Pages 185-187 in Proceedings and Papers of the National Fishery Congress, Tampa, Florida, January 19-24, 1898. US Commission of Fish and Fisheries. Washington, D. C., USA.
  25. Walters, C.J., and D. Ludwig. 1994. Calculation of Bayes posterior probability distributions for key population parameters. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:713-722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139%2Ff94-071 · DOI
  26. Walters, C. J., and S. J. Martell. 2004. Fisheries ecology and management. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  27. Walters, C. J., and J. R. Post. 1993. Density-dependent growth and competitive asymmetries in size-structured fish populations: a theoretical model and recommendations for field experiments. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 122:34-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1577%2F1548- 8659%281993%29122%3C0034%3ADDGACA%3E2. · DOI
  28. CO%3B2 Whitfield, W.K. Jr, and D.S. Beaumariage. 1977. Shellfish management in Apalachicola Bay: past-present-future. Pages 130-140 in R. J. Livingston and E. A. Joyce Jr, editors. Proceedings of the Conference on the Apalachicola Drainage System. Florida Department of Natural Resources, Florida Marine Resource Publication No. 26, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pine III, W. E., Walters, C. J., Camp, E. V., Bouchillon, R., Ahrens, R., Sturmer, L., & Berrigan, M. E.
Venue
Ecology and Society
Publisher
Resilience Alliance, Inc.
Published
2015
Volume
20
Issue
3
ISSN
1708-3087
DOI
10.5751/es-07827-200346
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review