How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitions?
Open accessAbstract
Dendoncker, N., F. Boeraeve, E. Crouzat, M. Dufrêne, A. König, and C. Barnaud. 2018. How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitions?. Ecology and Society 23(1):12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09843-230112
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ES tool is increasingly used to support decision making on sustainability issues, including in contexts of agroecological transitions.
“The tool is increasingly used to support decision making on sustainability issues [28], including in contexts of agroecological transitions [29].”
From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [29]
The Introduction proposes an ES framework to help understand and steer agroecological transitions, supporting the citation’s link between the tool and that context. But it describes this as a potential use, says the framework remains to be tested, and notes that existing agricultural ES valuations offer limited guidance for implementation. It does not establish that the tool is increasingly used for decision making in agroecological transitions. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWithin the proposed framework of Dendoncker et al., assessing the values and perceptions of all stakeholders involved represents a first step to developing a shared understanding of the agro-landscape to further support the co-construction of pathways of change.
“Within the proposed framework of Dendoncker et al. [29], assessing the values and perceptions of all stakeholders involved represents a first step to developing a shared understanding of the agro-landscape to further support the co-construction of pathways of change.”
From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 88
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Boogaard, B. K., B. B. Bock, S. J. Oosting, J. S. C. Wiskerke, and A. J. Zijpp. 2010. Social acceptance of dairy farming: the ambivalence between the two faces of modernity. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24(3):259-282.
- Chan, K. M. A., A. D. Guerry, P. Balvanera, S. Klein, T. Satterfield, X. Basurto, A. Bostrom, R. Chuenpagdee, R. Gould, B. S. Halpern, N. Hannahs, J. Levine, B. Norton, M. Ruckelshaus, R. Russell, J. Tam, and U. Woodside. 2012. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services: a framework for constructive engagement. BioScience 6(8):744-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ bio.2012.62.8. · DOI
- Dendoncker, N., H. Keune, S. Jacobs, and E. Gomez-Baggethun. 2013. Inclusive ecosystem services valuation. Pages 3-12 in S.
- Etienne, M., editor. 2014. Companion modelling. A participatory approach to support sustainable development. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
- Gelfand, I., and G. P. Robertson. 2015. Mitigation of greenhouse gases in agricultural ecosystems. Pages 419-458 in S. K. Hamilton, J. E. Doll, and G. P. Robertson, editors. The ecology of agricultural landscapes: long-term research on the path to sustainability. LTER Series, Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
- Jacobs, S., N. Dendoncker, B. Martin-Lopez, D. N. Barton, E. Gomez-Baggethun, F. Boeraeve, F. McGrath, K. Vierikko, D. Geneletti, S. J. Katharina, N. Pipart, E. Primmer, P. Mederly, S. Ecology and Society 23(1): 12 https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss1/art12/
- Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current states and trends. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
- Sen, A. 1995. Rationality and social choice. American Economic Review 85(1):1-24.
- Waylen, K. A., J. Martin-Ortega, K. L. Blackstock, I. Brown, B. E. Avendaño Uribe, S. Basurto Hernández, M. B. Bertoni, M. L. Bustos, A. X. Cruz Bayer, R. I. Escalante Semerena, M. A. Farah Quijano, F. Ferrelli, G. L. Fidalgo, I. Hernández López, M. A. Huamantinco Cisneros, S. London, D. L. Maya Vélez, P. N. Ecology and Society 23(1): 12 https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss1/art12/
- Authors
- Dendoncker, N., Boeraeve, F., Crouzat, E., Dufrêne, M., König, A., & Barnaud, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Namur (BE)
- University of Liège (BE)
- University of Luxembourg (LU)
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Publisher
- Resilience Alliance, Inc.
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 1708-3087 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2765903038
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 7.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Ecology and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (University of Toulouse) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Repository of the University of Namur (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
- Keywords
- ecosystem services valuation, agroecological transition, agroecology, sustainable agriculture, policy steering, land use change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
