Cited by 15IoT-based Smart Home SystemsUser Authentication and Security SystemsAdvanced Authentication Protocols Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Zero Trust Access Control with Context-Aware and Behavior-Based Continuous Authentication for Smart Homes

Open access
da Silva, Giovanni R., Macedo, Daniel F., dos Santos, Aldri L.·2021·Anais do XXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Segurança da Informação e de Sistemas Computacionais (SBSeg 2021)

Abstract

Generally, approaches to build the security of Smart Home Systems (SHS) require big amount of data to implement Access Control and Intrusion Detection Systems, with storage in cloud, for instance, being a vulnerability to inhabitants privacy. Besides, most works rely on cloud computing or resources in the cloud to perform security tasks, what can be exploited by attackers. This work presents the ZASH (Zero-Aware Smart Home System), an Access Control for SHS. ZASH uses Continuous Authentication with Zero Trust, supported by real-time context and activity information, enabled by Edge Computing and Markov Chain, to prevent and mitigate impersonation attacks that aim to invade inhabitants privacy. An experimental evaluation demonstrated the system capability to dynamically adapt to new inhabitants behaviors withal blocking impersonation attacks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5753/sbseg.2021.17305

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Cyber-Physical Systems Security—A Survey

    Humayed, A., Lin, J., Li, F., & Luo, B. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2703172 · Cited by 1,185 · cited 1×

    “These attacks often involve social engineering, when victims are de-ceived and their credentials can be stolen, and eavesdropping, when attacker steal information on the fly [Humayed et al. 2017].”
    Background
  • Advanced social engineering attacks

    Krombholz, K., Hobel, H., Huber, M., & Weippl, E. (2015) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2014.09.005 · Cited by 575 · cited 1×

    “The social engineering can range from simple techniques as baiting and phishing to more advanced ones as reverse social engineering and advanced persistent threat [Krombholz et al. 2015].”
    Method

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Alshammari, T., Alshammari, N., Sedky, M., and Howard, C. (2018). SIMADL: Simulated activities of daily living dataset. Data, 3(2):1-13.
  2. Amraoui, N., Besrour, A., Ksantini, R., and Zouari, B. (2020). Implicit and Continuous Authentication of Smart Home Users, volume 926. Springer International Publishing.
  3. Ashibani, Y., Kauling, D., and Mahmoud, Q. (2019). Design and Implementation of a Contextual-Based Continuous Authentication Framework for Smart Homes. Applied System Innovation, 2(1):4.
  4. Ashibani, Y. and Mahmoud, Q. H. (2019). User authentication for smart home networks based on mobile apps usage. Proceedings of Communications and Networks, ICCCN, 2019-July:1-6.
  5. Bakar, U. A. B. U. A., Ghayvat, H., Hasanm, S. F., and Mukhopadhyay, S. C. (2016). Activity and Anomaly Detection in Smart Home: A Survey, pages 191-220. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
  6. Castro, T. O., Caitité, V. G., Macedo, D. F., and dos Santos, A. L. (2019). CASA-IoT: Scalable and context- aware IoT access control supporting multiple users. International Journal of Network Management, 29(5):1-18.
  7. de Matos, E., Amaral, L. A., and Hessel, F. (2017). Context-aware systems: Technologies and challenges in internet of everything environments. In Beyond the Internet of Things, pages 1-25. Springer.
  8. Dimitrakos, T., Dilshener, T., Kravtsov, A., La Marra, A., Martinelli, F., Rizos, A., Rosett, A., and Sara- cino, A. (2020). Trust aware continuous authorization for zero trust in consumer internet of things. Proceedings -2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, TrustCom 2020, pages 1801-1812.
  9. Dong, M. and Ansari, N. (2020). Guest editorial: Special section on cyber-physical social sys- tems-integrating human into computing. IEEE Trans. on Emerging Topics in Computing, 8(1):4-5.
  10. Ghosh, N., Chandra, S., Sachidananda, V., and Elovici, Y. (2019). SoftAuthZ: A Context-Aware, Behavior- Based Authorization Framework for Home IoT. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(6):10773-10785.
  11. Junior, C. P., Santos, A., and Nogueira, M. (2020). Detecting fdi attack on dense iot network with distributed filtering collaboration and consensus. In 2020 IEEE Latin-American Conference on Communications (LATINCOM), pages 1-6.
  12. Kuyucu, M. K., Bahtiyar, , and İnce, G. (2019). Security and privacy in the smart home: A survey of issues and mitigation strategies. In 2019 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), pages 113-118.
  13. Lal, N. A., Prasad, S., and Farik, M. (2015). A Review Of Authentication Methods. International Journal of Scientific Technology Research, 4(8):246-249.
  14. Mocrii, D., Chen, Y., and Musilek, P. (2018). IoT-based smart homes: A review of system architecture, software, communications, privacy and security. Internet of Things, 1-2:81-98.
  15. Sikder, A. K., Aksu, H., and Uluagac, A. S. (2020). A context-aware framework for detecting sensor-based threats on smart devices. IEEE Trans. on Mobile Computing, 19(2):245-261.
  16. Sikder, A. K., Babun, L., Aksu, H., and Uluagac, A. S. (2019). AEGIS: A Context-aware Security Frame- work for Smart Home Systems. ACM Int. Conference Proceeding Series, pages 28-41.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
da Silva, G. R., Macedo, D. F., & dos Santos, A. L.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Corresponding author
Macedo, Daniel F.
Venue
Anais do XXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Segurança da Informação e de Sistemas Computacionais (SBSeg 2021)
Published
2021-10-04
Pages
43-56
OpenAlex
W3202154704
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Simpósio Brasileiro de Cibersegurança (SBSeg) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (436649/2018-7)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT-based Smart Home Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
Keywords
zero-trust architecture, access control, home automation, continuous authentication, context-aware authentication, edge computing, Markov chains, impersonation attacks, privacy preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review