The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hepatogastroenterology
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: ERCP-related procedures involve radiation exposure of patients and medical staff. We developed a novel protective lead shield which is attached around the fluoroscopy generator. Here we examine levels of radiation exposure to patients, endoscopists and assistants, and evaluate the usefulness of the newly designed protective shield. METHODOLOGY: Four-hundred and seventy-one ERCP procedures were performed from April 2006 to April 2007. At first, we compared the radiation dose of consecutive fluoroscopy conditions with pulse fluoroscopy of 15 per second and then the radiation dose with and without the protective shield. Next, we measured the radiation exposure of endoscopists and assistants in the clinical setting monitored by digital dosimeter during ERCP procedure. RESULTS: The radiation dose was the most at the 45° direction. Using pulse fluoroscopy of 15 per second the radiation dose of patients and endoscopists decreased by about half. Using both pulse fluoroscopy of 15 per second and the protective shield, the radiation dose at the endoscopist's position was reduced up to 97%. The total fluoroscopy time was 5851 minutes in the 471 ERCP cases. Using pulse 15 and the protective lead shield, the radiation exposure dose of one endoscopist and two assistants were 2430.8, 2673.9 and 1375.0µSv, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Novel protective lead shield in combination with pulse fluoroscopy can significantly reduce the radiation exposure leading to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure to patients and medical staff.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The ???small for size??? liver syndrome
Tucker, O. N., & Heaton, N. (2005) · Current Opinion in Critical Care · doi:10.1097/01.ccx.0000157080.11117.45 · Cited by 180
Phase I/II study of pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG 20) in patients with advanced melanoma
Ott, P. A., Carvajal, R. D., Pandit-Taskar, N., Jungbluth, A. A., Hoffman, E. W., Wu, B.-W., Bomalaski, J. S., Venhaus, R., Pan, L., Old, L. J., et al. (2013) · Investigational New Drugs · doi:10.1007/s10637-012-9862-2 · Cited by 146
Incidence of chronic atrophic gastritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of follow-up studies
Adamu, M. A., Weck, M. N., Gao, L., & Brenner, H. (2010) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9482-0 · Cited by 140
Liu, F.-Y., Zhou, S.-J., Deng, Y.-L., Zhang, Z.-Y., Zhang, E.-L., Wu, Z.-B., Huang, Z.-Y., & Chen, X.-P. (2015) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2015.46 · Cited by 114
Lee, S.-H., Veeriah, V., & Levine, F. (2021) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-021-03862-x · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Venue
- Hepatogastroenterology
- Publisher
- Update Medical Publishing
- Published
- 2011-12-19
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 115
- Pages
- 709-12
- ISSN
- 0172-6390 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7797722
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatogastroenterology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5754/hge11764
- The paper
- Hepatogastroenterology. (2011). Hepatogastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.5754/hge11764
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.