Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,338

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Hepatogastroenterology

·2012·Hepatogastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) against unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. METHODOLOGY: Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously at 100mg/m2 for two hours on day 1 and S-1 was administered b.i.d. at 80mg/m2/day on days 1-14 followed by a 7-day rest during the 3-week schedule. RESULTS: All 51 patients were assessed for efficacy and adverse events. The response and disease control rates were 41% and 90%, respectively. The response rate was significantly improved in patients with ECOG performance status of no more than 1, elevated CEA levels or unresected primary cancers. The median follow-up time was 11.8 months, the median time to progression was 6.8 months, the median overall survival was 11.8 months and the 1-year survival rate was 47.4%. Patients with diffused type exhibited significantly decreased time to progression and overall survival. The grade 3/4 adverse events were hematological toxicities, including neutropenia (13.7%), thrombocytopenia (13.7%) and anemia (11.8%). The incidence of grade 3/4 non-hematological events was low (≤2%). CONCLUSIONS: The SOX regimen (oxaliplatin, 100mg/m2 d1; S-1, 80mg/m2/day, b.i.d. d1-14, q3w) provided a favorable efficacy and safety profile in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5754/hge11893

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,338

Metadata

Venue
Hepatogastroenterology
Published
2012-02-13
Volume
59
Issue
114
Pages
649-53
ISSN
0172-6390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W21933366
Cited by
1,338
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatogastroenterology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5754/hge11893
The paper
Hepatogastroenterology. (2012). Hepatogastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.5754/hge11893

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.