Cited by 5Advanced Wireless Network OptimizationWireless Communication Networks ResearchNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control

Self-Organizing Networks: A Packet Scheduling Approach for Coverage/Capacity Optimization in 4G Networks Using Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Tiwana, Moazzam Islam, Nawaz, Syed Junaid, Ikram, Ataul Aziz, Tiwana, Mohsin Islam·2014·Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika

Abstract

The next generation mobile networks LTE and LTE-A are all-IP based networks. In such IP based networks, the issue of Quality of Service (QoS) is becoming more and more critical with the increase in network size and heterogeneity. In this paper, a Reinforcement Learning (RL) based framework for QoS enhancement is proposed. The framework achieves the coverage/capacity optimization by adjusting the scheduling strategy. The proposed self-optimization algorithm uses coverage/capacity compromise in Packet Scheduling (PS) to maximize the capacity of an eNB subject to the condition that minimum coverage constraint is not violated. Each eNB has an associated agent that dynamically changes the scheduling parameter value of an eNB. The agent uses the RL technique of Fuzzy Q-Learning (FQL) to learn the optimal scheduling parameter. The learning framework is designed to operate in an environment with varying traffic, user positions, and propagation conditions. A comprehensive analysis on the obtained simulation results is presented, which shows that the proposed approach can significantly improve the network coverage as well as capacity in terms of throughput. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.20.9.4786

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5755/j01.eee.20.9.4786

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A model-free distributed reinforcement learning method for power allocation is proposed, in which CSI and QoS indicators are exploited to adapt transmit power.

    “In this regard, a model-free distributed reinforcement learning method for power allocation is proposed [79], in which Channel State Information (CSI) and QoS indicators are exploited to adapt the transmit power.”

    From Quantum Machine Learning for 6G Communication Networks: State-of-the-Art and Vision for the Future (2019) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Abstract and Introduction describe a reinforcement-learning agent at each eNB, but explicitly identify the adapted variable as the α-fair packet-scheduling parameter. The claimed power-allocation method is contrary to the paper’s stated contribution; the Simulation Scenario lists transmit power only as a simulation parameter. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. T. Kato, "Next-generation mobile network", FUJITSU Scientific and Technical Journal, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 11-16, 2012.
  2. O. Sallent, J. Perez-Romero, J. Sanchez-Gonzalez, R. Agusti, M. A. Diaz-Guerra, D. Henche, D. Paul, "A Roadmap from UMTS Optimization to LTE Self-Optimization", IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 172-182, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2011.5784003 · DOI
  3. H. Hu, J. Zhang, X. Zheng, Y. Yang, P. Wu, "Self-configuration and self-optimization for LTE networks", IEEE Communication Magazine, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 94-100, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2010.5402670 · DOI
  4. P. Magnusson, J. Oom, "An Architecture for self-tuning cellular systems", in Proc. of the IEEE/IFIP Inter. Symp. on Integrated Network Management, pp. 231-245, 2001.
  5. Hoglund, K. Valkealahti, "Automated optimization of key WCDMA parameters", Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 5, pp. 257-271, 2005. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcm.212 · DOI
  6. Z. Altman et al., Understanding UMTS Radio network modelling, planning and automated optimization: theory and practice. Wiley, 2006, ch. 16.
  7. R. Nasri, A. Samhat, Z. Altman, "A new approach of UMTS-WLAN load balancing; algorithm and its dynamic optimization", in 1st IEEE WoWMoM Workshop on Autonomic Wireless Access (IWAS 2007), Helsinki, Finland, 2007.
  8. P. P. Hasselbach, A. Klein, I. Gaspard, "Dynamic resource assignment (DRA) with minimum outage in cellular mobile radio networks", Vehicular Technology Conf., 2008.
  9. B. Ghimire, G. Auer, H. Haas, "Busy burst for trading-off throughput and fairness in cellular OFDMA-TDD", EURASIP J. Wireless Communications and Networking, vol. 10, 2009.
  10. M. Dirani, Z. Altman, "A cooperative reinforcement learning approach for inter-cell interference coordination in OFDMA cellular networks", in Proc. of the 8th Int. Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt), Avignion, France, 2010.
  11. R. Nasri, Z. Altman, "Handover adaptation for dynamic load balancing in 3GPP long term evolution systems", in 5th Int. Conf. on Advanced in Mobile Computing & Multimedia (MoMM 2007), Jakarta, Indonesia, 2007.
  12. A. Lobinger, S. Stefanski, T. Jansen, I. Balan, "Load Balancing in Downlink LTE Self Optimizing Networks", in Proc. of IEEE 71st Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC 2010), 2010.
  13. P. Munoz, R. Barco, I. de la Bandera, M. Toril, S. Luna, "Optimization of a Fuzzy Logic Controller for Handover-based Load Balancing", Int. Workshop on Self-Organzsing Networks (IWSON), IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf. (VTC), Budapest, Hungary, 2011.
  14. J. Rodriguez, I. de la Bandera, P. Munoz, R. Barco, "Load Balancing in a Realistic Urban Scenario for LTE Networks", in IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), Budapest, Hungary, 2011.
  15. M. Naseer ul Islam, A. Mitschele-Thiel, "Reinforcement learning strategies for self-organized coverage and capacity optimization", IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf. (WCNC), 2012, pp. 2818-2823.
  16. R. Razavi, S. Klein, H. Claussen, "Self-optimization of capacity and coverage in LTE networks using a fuzzy reinforcement learning approach", IEEE 21st Int. Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), 2010, pp. 1865-1870, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.2010. 5671622 · DOI
  17. J. Li, J. Zeng, X. Su, W. Luo, J. Wang, "Self-optimization of coverage and capacity in LTE networks based on central control and decentralized fuzzy Q-learning", Int. Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ 2012/878595 · DOI
  18. J. Mo, J. Warland, "Fair end-to-end window based congestion control", in IEEE Trans. networking, vol. 8, pp. 556-566, 2000.
  19. M.I. Tiwana, "Enhancemant of the Statistical Learning Automated Healing (SLAH) technique using packet scheduling", Int. Conf. Emerging Technologies (ICET), 2012, pp. 1-5. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICET.2012.6375437 · DOI
  20. H. Kushner, P. Whiting, "Convergence of proportional-fair sharing algorithms under general conditions", in IEEE Trans. on wireless communications, vol. 3, pp. 1250-1259, 2004.
  21. R. S. Sutton, A. G. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, 1998.
  22. L. Jouffe, "Fuzzy Inference System Learning by reinforcement Methods", IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1998, vol. 28, pp. 338-355. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ 5326.704563 · DOI
  23. R. Nasri, Z. Altman, H. Dubreil, "Fuzzy Q-Learning based autonomic management of macrodiversity algorithm", UMTS networks, Annals of Telecommunications, pp. 1119-1135, 2006.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tiwana, M. I., Nawaz, S. J., Ikram, A. A., & Tiwana, M. I.
Affiliations
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
  • National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (PK)
Venue
Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika
Published
2014-11-05
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
59-64
ISSN
  • 1392-1215 (ISSN-L)
  • 2029-5731
OpenAlex
W2044988590
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Communication Networks Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
Keywords
packet scheduling, reinforcement learning, fuzzy Q-learning, LTE, LTE-Advanced, quality of service, self-organizing networks, throughput maximization, heterogeneous networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review