Cited by 46Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisLung Cancer Research StudiesLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Preoperative Platelet to Albumin Ratio Predicts Outcome of Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Guo, Manman, Sun, Ting, Zhao, Zhuochen, Ming, Liang·2021·Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive power of the platelet to albumin ratio (PAR) on survival outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 198 patients with NSCLC were recruited. The X-tile software was performed to identify the optimal cutoff values for PAR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The Kaplan-Meier method, univariate and multivariate analyses Cox regression were used to analyze the prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). RESULTS: (P <0.001), PLR > 147.7 (P <0.001), and NLR >3.9 (P = 0.007) were associated with poor OS. Multivariate analyses found that PAR was an independent predictor in NSCLC patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.604, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.557-8.290, P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative PAR is a useful and potential prognostic biomarker in NSCLC patients who have received primary resection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5761/atcs.oa.20-00090

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, M., Sun, T., Zhao, Z., & Ming, L.
Affiliations
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ming, Liang
Venue
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Published
2021
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
84-90
ISSN
  • 1341-1098 (ISSN-L)
  • 2186-1005
OpenAlex
W3104577155
Cited by
46
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
platelet-to-albumin ratio, non-small cell lung cancer, prognostic factors, overall survival, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, surgical resection
MeSH terms
Serum Albumin, Human, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Platelets, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Platelet Count, Pneumonectomy, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review