The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Factors influencing learning flow of Korean nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
본 연구의 목적은 국내 간호대학생의 학습몰입 관련 요인에 대한 체계적 고찰과 관련된 요인을 규명하기 위함이다. 연구는 PRISMA(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 지침에 의해 수행되었으며, 국내 간호대학생의 학습몰입과 관련된 문헌 검색은 DBpia, Riss, Kiss, KMbase, KNbase, NDSL을 이용하였다. 연구에서는 최종 35편의 연구가 검토되었으며 메타분석을 위해 R program version 3.5.3을 사용하였고, 각 관련 요인에 대한 총 상관관계 효과크기(ESr)는 Fisher
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lack of between-group difference in LI may reflect the influence of multiple interacting factors including learners' individual characteristics, adaptation to the learning environment, and contextual factors rather than a single determinant.
“This result may reflect the influence of multiple interacting factors including learners’ individual characteristics, adaptation to the learning environment, and contextual factors rather than a single determinant [35].”
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, Y.-S., & Lee, K.-S.
- ORCID
- Lee, Kyoung-Sook
- Venue
- Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
- Published
- 2022-06-30
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 151-162
- ISSN
- 1975-4701 (ISSN-L)
- 2288-4688
- OpenAlex
- W4283803267
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Keywords
- learning flow, nursing students, Korean nursing students, nursing education, student engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review