Cited by 1Flow Experience in Various FieldsHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesNursing education and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Factors influencing learning flow of Korean nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Kim, Young-Sook, Lee, Kyoung-Sook·2022·Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society

Abstract

본 연구의 목적은 국내 간호대학생의 학습몰입 관련 요인에 대한 체계적 고찰과 관련된 요인을 규명하기 위함이다. 연구는 PRISMA(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 지침에 의해 수행되었으며, 국내 간호대학생의 학습몰입과 관련된 문헌 검색은 DBpia, Riss, Kiss, KMbase, KNbase, NDSL을 이용하였다. 연구에서는 최종 35편의 연구가 검토되었으며 메타분석을 위해 R program version 3.5.3을 사용하였고, 각 관련 요인에 대한 총 상관관계 효과크기(ESr)는 Fisher

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5762/kais.2022.23.6.151

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 1

Metadata

Authors
Kim, Y.-S., & Lee, K.-S.
Venue
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
Published
2022-06-30
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
151-162
ISSN
  • 1975-4701 (ISSN-L)
  • 2288-4688
OpenAlex
W4283803267
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
learning flow, nursing students, Korean nursing students, nursing education, student engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review