Cited by 25Gender and Feminist StudiesGender, Sexuality, and EducationAfrican Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tabulating Queer: Space, Perversion, and Belonging

Keilty, Patrick·2009·KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION

Abstract

Considering fields as diverse as the history of science, Internet studies, border studies, and coalition politics, the article gives an historical overview of how the knowledge around queer phenomena has been structured, tabulated, and spacialized: the hazards, coercive and productive qualities, as well as queer's paradoxical relationship as both resistant to and reliant on categories, classification, and knowledge structures. In the process, the article also considers the development of Western hierarchical knowledge structures in relation to societal power dynamics, proximity, and space.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5771/0943-7444-2009-4-240

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Keilty, P.
Corresponding author
Keilty, Patrick
Venue
KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION
Publisher
IMR Press
Published
2009
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
240-248
ISSN
  • 0340-0050 (ISSN-L)
  • 0943-7444
OpenAlex
W2164334023
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
Keywords
queer, tabulation, classification, knowledge structure, space, perversion, sense of belonging, proximity, history of science, internet studies, border studies, coalition politics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tabulating Queer: Space, Perversion, and Belonging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5771/0943-7444-2009-4-240
The paper
Keilty, P. (2009). Tabulating Queer: Space, Perversion, and Belonging. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2009-4-240