Dinâmica socioeconômica e desmatamento na Amazônia
Open accessAbstract
This text shows the importance to understanding the rationality of actors and the motivation, both of individuals and groups, which show the main causes of the advance of the economic activities and of deforestation. This is revealed in the analysis of socio-spatial strategies and the main social actors and economic agents present in new frontier areas. It reveals the present mechanisms in the relation between the interests of the economic agents and the political processes. It examines how networks are built to integrate the local and the globe, defining the tendencies to the globalized market action in the region.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deforestation confers on the occupant greater capitalization (because deforested land is more valued) and provides benefits through the sale of wood and the development of cattle activities.
“In fact, as observed in section 2, deforestation confers on the occupant greater capitalization (because deforested land is more valued) and provides benefits through the sale of wood and the development of cattle activities.”
From Land inequality and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon (2017) · cites this paper as Castro (2005)
The Introduction links capitalization and income to cattle ranching alongside timber exploitation, and section 9 says settlers sell wood from their plots. But the paper does not say that clearing itself makes land more valuable; section 5 instead links rising land prices to new demand for soy production. The specific explanation for greater capitalization is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- SCHRADER, A. (eds.). Homem e natureza na Amazônia/Humbre y naturaleza en la Amazonia. Tubingen: Universidade de Tubingen, 1987. p. 45-57.
- FOWERAKER, Joe. The struggle for land: A political economy of the pioneer frontier in Brazil from 1930 to the present day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
- LEFF, E. Green production: toward an environmental rationality. New York/ London: The Guilford Press, 1999.
- MARGALEFF, R. Perspectives in ecological theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
- NASH, R. The rights of nature: a history of environmental ethics. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.
- PACHECO, Pablo. Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: a review of estimates of the municipal level. Belém, 2002. (não publicado)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Land inequality and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Sant'anna, A. A. (2017) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x1600022x · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Castro, E.
- Affiliations
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Castro, Edna
- ORCID
- Castro, Edna
- Venue
- Novos Cadernos NAEA
- Publisher
- Universidade Federal do Para
- Published
- 2005-12-18
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1516-6481 (ISSN-L)
- 2179-7536
- OpenAlex
- W1999614892
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Novos Cadernos NAEA (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
- Keywords
- deforestation, socio-economic dynamics, Amazon, frontier areas, economic agents, actor rationality, political process, globalization, economic networks, global-local integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
