The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parallel metaphors in theosophy and transhumanism
Open accessAbstract
Parallel Metaphors in Theosophy and Transhumanism aaron FrenchMan is something that shall be overcome.What have you done to overcome him? 1 A recurring vision swirls in the shared mind of the Net, a vision that nearly every member glimpses, if only momentarily: of wiring human and artificial minds into one planetary soul.This incipient techno-spiritualism is all the more remarkable because of how unexpected it has been.The Net, after all, is nothing more than a bunch of highly engineered pieces of rock braided together with strands of metal or glass.It is routine technology.Computers, which have been in our lives for twenty years, have made our life faster but not that much different.Nobody expected a new culture, a new thrill, or even a new politics to be born when we married calculating circuits with the ordinary telephone; but that's exactly what happened.2 In The Singularity Is Near (2005), pioneering transhumanist Raymond Kurzweil described the end goal of a six-epoch evolutionary cosmology, claiming that "once non-biological intelligence gets a foothold in the human brain … the machine intelligence in our brains will grow exponen-tially… Ultimately, the entire universe will become saturated with our intelligence.This is the destiny of the universe."3 This future destiny will be a world in which the limited physical body has been transcended through a merger of human beings and machines.Similarly, the above quote from Wired magazine founder and technologist Kevin Kelly points to this merging of technology and living nature (including humans).Other prominent transhumanists such as Max More, James Hughes, Hans Moravec, Marvin Minsky, and Nick Bostrom also share this vision of a post-humanity in which our physical bodies have been replaced by circuits 1
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Following Steiner and Ben-Aharon, this shows how the spiritual potential of the human being is in the process of being co-opted by materialist techno-scientific operations.”
From God and Humanity in an Evolving Universe: Rudolf Steiner's Christology and the Knowledge Drama of the Second Coming in the Work of Yeshayahu Ben-Aharon (2026) · cites this paper as French 2022, p. 26
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eftestøl, T., & Qvick, J. (2026) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel17030395
Metadata
- Authors
- French, A.
- Corresponding author
- French, Aaron
- Venue
- Religio: revue pro religionistiku
- Publisher
- Masaryk University Press
- Published
- 2022
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- [25]-43
- ISSN
- 1210-3640 (ISSN-L)
- 2336-4475
- OpenAlex
- W4292982350
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- cs
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Religio revue pro religionistiku (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Keywords
- Theosophy, transhumanism, posthumanism, metaphor, Ray Kurzweil, Kevin Kelly, artificial intelligence, technological evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parallel metaphors in theosophy and transhumanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5817/rel2022-1-3
- The paper
- French, A. (2022). Parallel metaphors in theosophy and transhumanism. Religio: revue pro religionistiku. https://doi.org/10.5817/rel2022-1-3