Consciousness as Generative Entanglement
Open accessAbstract
Recent work in cognitive and computational neuroscience depicts the human brain as a complex, multi-layer prediction engine. This family of models has had great success in accounting for a wide variety of phenomena involving perception, action, and attention. But despite their clear promise as accounts of the neurocomputational origins of perceptual experience, they have not yet been leveraged so as to shed light on the so-called “hard problem” of consciousness—the problem of explaining why and how the world is subjectively experienced at all, and why those experiences seem just the way they do. To address this issue, I motivate and defend a picture of conscious experience as flowing from “generative entanglements” that mix predictions about the world, the body, and (crucially) our own reactive dispositions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is through inference about allostatic control that a conscious agent encounters a structured world apt for action and intervention, inflected at every level by an interoceptively-mediated sense of mattering.
“It is through this inference about allostatic control that a conscious agent encounters ‘a structured world apt for action and intervention, and inflected at every level, by an interoceptively-mediated sense of mattering, reflecting “how things are for me as an embodied agent”’ (Clark 2019, 7).”
From Consciousness in active inference: Deep self-models, other minds, and the challenge of psychedelic-induced ego-dissolution (2021) · cites this paper as Clark 2019
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 6 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Clark, A., & Journal of Philosophy Inc.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Clark, Andy
- ORCID
- Clark, Andy
- Venue
- The Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 645-662
- ISSN
- 0022-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996546981
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The Journal of Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
- Keywords
- consciousness, hard problem of consciousness, predictive processing, perceptual experience, subjective experience, embodied cognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review