Narrative Identity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In this view, the performance and discussion of fictional narratives can create prosocial dispositions by activating shared frames of reference and a collective orientation towards the future.
“In this view, the performance and discussion of fictional narratives can create prosocial dispositions by activating shared frames of reference and a collective orientation towards the future [81, 104].”
From Five studies evaluating the impact on mental health and mood of recalling, reading, and discussing fiction (2022) · cites this paper as [81]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 591
- Authors
- Ricoeur, P., & DePaul University
- Venue
- Philosophy Today
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-81
- ISSN
- 0031-8256 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4255483195
- Cited by
- 591
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 44 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 13.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophy Today (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Keywords
- narrative identity, personal identity, selfhood, life stories
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
