The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Humean Supervenience
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“And Loewer (1996, p. 113), in his discussion of the best system account, commits to the view that such laws explain via unification.”
From Nomothetic Explanation and Humeanism about Laws of Nature (2020) · cites this paper as Loewer (1996, p. 113)
In the citing paper
“But surprisingly, Humeans have not committed to it in the literature, apart from the brief mention in Loewer (1996).”
From Nomothetic Explanation and Humeanism about Laws of Nature (2020) · cites this paper as Loewer (1996)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Loewer, B. (2012) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-012-9911-x · Cited by 324
Self-citationA better best system account of lawhood
Cohen, J., & Callender, C. (2009) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-009-9389-3 · Cited by 313
The open future: bivalence, determinism and ontology
Barnes, E. A., & Cameron, R. P. (2008) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-008-9257-6 · Cited by 186
The Ontology of Bohmian Mechanics
Esfeld, M., Hubert, M., Lazarovici, D., & Dürr, D. (2013) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axt019 · Cited by 165
Humean Reductionism about Laws of Nature
Hall, N. (2015) · A Companion to David Lewis · doi:10.1002/9781118398593.ch17 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Loewer, B., & University of Arkansas Press
- Corresponding author
- Loewer, Barry
- Venue
- Philosophical Topics
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-127
- ISSN
- 0276-2080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4253969586
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophical Topics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › David Hume Studies
- Keywords
- Humean supervenience, David Hume, supervenience, Humeanism, metaphysics of mind, philosophy of mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
