The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Feminism/Postmodernism
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women's Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x · Cited by 5,531
Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667087 · Cited by 2,433
Must Identity Movements Self-Destruct? A Queer Dilemma
Gamson, J. (1995) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/3096854 · Cited by 921
Insider or outsider, both or neither: some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting
Mullings, B. (1999) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/s0016-7185(99)00025-1 · Cited by 710
The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global
Held, V. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0195180992.001.0001 · Cited by 615
Metadata
- Authors
- Narayan, U., & Radical Philosophy Association
- Venue
- Radical Philosophy Review of Books
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 7-15
- ISSN
- 1047-8302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4253768812
- Cited by
- 1,888
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 197.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feminism/Postmodernism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5840/radphilrevbooks199135
- The paper
- Narayan, U., & Radical Philosophy Association. (1991). Feminism/Postmodernism. Radical Philosophy Review of Books. https://doi.org/10.5840/radphilrevbooks199135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
