Carbon, Harvest Yields, and Residues from Restoration in a Mixed Forest on California's Coast Range
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conversion of forest residues to biochar reduces the need for controlled pile and burning of forest residues, which causes air pollution and damages human health.
“It also reduces the need for controlled pile and burning of forest residues, which causes air pollution and damages human health [9].”
From Lifecycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Biochar Pellet Production from Forest Residues and Field Application (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Berrill, J.-P., & Han, H.-S.
- Affiliations
- Cal Poly Humboldt (US)
- Venue
- Forest Science
- Published
- 2017-02-15
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 128-135
- ISSN
- 0015-749X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2585901833
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forest Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
- Keywords
- forest restoration, carbon storage, harvest yield, forest residues, individual tree selection, group selection, clear-cutting, silvicultural prescriptions, ecosystem services, Coast Range
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
