Cited by 1Edible Oils Quality and AnalysisBiodiesel Production and ApplicationsThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

Peningkatan Pemurnian Minyak Jelantah melalui Sistem Adsorben Ganda: Bleaching Earth dan Karbon dari Kulit Buah Kakao (Theobroma cacao L)

Open access
Utami, Esssylia Afriyanti, Nizar, Umar Kalmar, Etika, Sri Benti·2025·MASALIQ

Abstract

Used cooking oil (minyak jelantah) is a household and industrial waste product that poses environmental risks and undergoes significant quality degradation due to the breakdown of chemical compounds during repeated use. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a combination of activated carbon derived from cocoa pod husk waste and bleaching earth in improving the quality of used cooking oil. The research was conducted experimentally in the laboratory of Universitas Negeri Padang using used cooking oil obtained from local vendors. Activated carbon was prepared by calcining cocoa pod husks at 350°C for varying durations of 30, 45, 60, and 75 minutes, followed by activation with 1M NaOH solution. The purification process was carried out in stages through the addition of activated carbon and bleaching earth under controlled heating conditions. Parameters analyzed included acid number, moisture content, density, saponification value, and functional group characterization using infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The results indicate that the most effective adsorbent combination was achieved with activated carbon calcined for 60 minutes, which reduced the acid number from 14.92 to 5.09 mg KOH/g, decreased moisture content to 0.11%, and increased the saponification value to 75.30 mg KOH/g. The FTIR spectrum showed reduced intensity in functional groups associated with degradation, indicating effective purification. In conclusion, the combination of activated carbon from cocoa pod husk waste and bleaching earth is proven effective in improving the physicochemical quality of used cooking oil, while also demonstrating the potential for sustainable and environmentally friendly use of agricultural waste as raw material for adsorbents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.58578/masaliq.v5i3.6039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Utami, E. A., Nizar, U. K., & Etika, S. B.
Affiliations
Universitas Negeri Padang (ID)
Corresponding author
Utami, Esssylia Afriyanti
Venue
MASALIQ
Published
2025-05-31
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
1368-1392
ISSN
  • 2808-8115 (ISSN-L)
  • 2809-1051
OpenAlex
W4410921546
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
MASALIQ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biodiesel Production and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
waste cooking oil, oil purification, bleaching earth, activated carbon, cocoa pod husk, Theobroma cacao, calcination time, alkali activation, acid value, saponification value, agricultural waste valorization, waste oil recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review