Peningkatan Pemurnian Minyak Jelantah melalui Sistem Adsorben Ganda: Bleaching Earth dan Karbon dari Kulit Buah Kakao (Theobroma cacao L)
Open accessAbstract
Used cooking oil (minyak jelantah) is a household and industrial waste product that poses environmental risks and undergoes significant quality degradation due to the breakdown of chemical compounds during repeated use. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a combination of activated carbon derived from cocoa pod husk waste and bleaching earth in improving the quality of used cooking oil. The research was conducted experimentally in the laboratory of Universitas Negeri Padang using used cooking oil obtained from local vendors. Activated carbon was prepared by calcining cocoa pod husks at 350°C for varying durations of 30, 45, 60, and 75 minutes, followed by activation with 1M NaOH solution. The purification process was carried out in stages through the addition of activated carbon and bleaching earth under controlled heating conditions. Parameters analyzed included acid number, moisture content, density, saponification value, and functional group characterization using infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The results indicate that the most effective adsorbent combination was achieved with activated carbon calcined for 60 minutes, which reduced the acid number from 14.92 to 5.09 mg KOH/g, decreased moisture content to 0.11%, and increased the saponification value to 75.30 mg KOH/g. The FTIR spectrum showed reduced intensity in functional groups associated with degradation, indicating effective purification. In conclusion, the combination of activated carbon from cocoa pod husk waste and bleaching earth is proven effective in improving the physicochemical quality of used cooking oil, while also demonstrating the potential for sustainable and environmentally friendly use of agricultural waste as raw material for adsorbents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The presence of water can trigger a hydrolysis reaction, in which water breaks down triglycerides into free fatty acids and glycerol, increasing acid number and accelerating oil degradation.
“The presence of water can trigger a hydrolysis reaction, in which the water breaks down triglycerides into free fatty acids and glycerol, increasing the acid number and accelerating the oil degradation process (Utami et al ., 2025).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nababan, E. J., & Husni, A. (2026) · Jurnal Pengolahan Hasil Perikanan Indonesia · doi:10.17844/scdvhk06
- Authors
- Utami, E. A., Nizar, U. K., & Etika, S. B.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Negeri Padang (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Utami, Esssylia Afriyanti
- ORCID
- Nizar, Umar Kalmar
- Venue
- MASALIQ
- Publisher
- Darul Yasin Al Sys
- Published
- 2025-05-31
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1368-1392
- ISSN
- 2808-8115 (ISSN-L)
- 2809-1051
- OpenAlex
- W4410921546
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- MASALIQ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biodiesel Production and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- waste cooking oil, oil purification, bleaching earth, activated carbon, cocoa pod husk, Theobroma cacao, calcination time, alkali activation, acid value, saponification value, agricultural waste valorization, waste oil recycling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review