Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Factors in Prostate Cancer: College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999

Bostwick, David G., Grignon, David J., Hammond, M. Elizabeth H., Amin, Mahul B., Cohen, Michael, Crawford, David, Gospadarowicz, Mary, Kaplan, Richard S., Miller, Daniel S., Montironi, Rodolfo, Pajak, Thomas F., Pollack, Alan, Srigley, John R., Yarbro, John W.·2000·Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

Background. —Under the auspices of the College of American Pathologists, a multidisciplinary group of clinicians, pathologists, and statisticians considered prognostic and predictive factors in prostate cancer and stratified them into categories reflecting the strength of published evidence and taking into account the expert opinions of the Prostate Working Group members. Materials and Methods. —Factors were ranked according to the previous College of American Pathologists categorical rankings: category I, factors proven to be of prognostic importance and useful in clinical patient management; category II, factors that have been extensively studied biologically and clinically but whose importance remains to be validated in statistically robust studies; and category III, all other factors not sufficiently studied to demonstrate their prognostic value. Factors in categories I and II were considered with respect to variations in methods of analysis, interpretation of findings, reporting of data, and statistical evaluation. For each factor, detailed recommendations for improvement were made. Recommendations were based on the following aims: (1) increasing uniformity and completeness of pathologic evaluation of tumor specimens, (2) enhancing the quality of data collected pertaining to existing prognostic factors, and (3) improving patient care. Results and Conclusions. —Factors ranked in category I included preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level, TNM stage grouping, histologic grade as Gleason score, and surgical margin status. Category II factors included tumor volume, histologic type, and DNA ploidy. Factors in category III included perineural invasion, neuroendocrine differentiation, microvessel density, nuclear roundness, chromatin texture, other karyometric factors, proliferation markers, prostate-specific antigen derivatives, and other factors (oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, apoptosis genes, etc).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5858/2000-124-0995-pfipc

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,239

Metadata

Authors
Bostwick, D. G., Grignon, D. J., Hammond, M. E. H., Amin, M. B., Cohen, M., Crawford, D., Gospadarowicz, M., Kaplan, R. S., Miller, D. S., Montironi, R., Pajak, T. F., Pollack, A., Srigley, J. R., & Yarbro, J. W.
Venue
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
Published
2000-06
Volume
124
Issue
7
Pages
995-1000
ISSN
  • 1543-2165
  • 0003-9985
OpenAlex
W2188742179
Cited by
1,239
References
1
FWCI
24.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Factors in Prostate Cancer: College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5858/2000-124-0995-pfipc
The paper
Bostwick, D. G., Grignon, D. J., Hammond, M. E. H., Amin, M. B., Cohen, M., Crawford, D., Gospadarowicz, M., Kaplan, R. S., Miller, D. S., Montironi, R., Pajak, T. F., Pollack, A., Srigley, J. R., & Yarbro, J. W. (2000). Prognostic Factors in Prostate Cancer: College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.5858/2000-124-0995-pfipc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.