The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Are Distinct Pathologic Entities: A Review of 56 Autopsy Cases
Abstract
Context. —Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and the hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) share many clinical features and have been difficult to separate into distinct entities. Histologic examination of organs from autopsied patients suggested that TTP and HUS have dissimilar lesions of different severity and distribution. Objective. —To perform a retrospective observational review of autopsied patients with TTP or HUS to compare the nature and severity of the lesions found. Design. —To examine the pathologic features of these conditions, we reviewed all cases among 51 350 indexed autopsies at The Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, Md) diagnosed with TTP or HUS, and included those showing multiple arteriolar thrombi or their sequela. Results. —The 56 cases that met the inclusion criteria fell into 2 distinct groups, based on distribution and severity of arteriolar lesions. In 25 patients classified as having TTP, platelet-rich thrombi were present—in decreasing severity—in heart, pancreas, kidney, adrenal gland, and brain. In 31 patients with HUS, fibrin/red cell–rich thrombi were present, largely confined to the kidney and often severe, and only 6 cases showed pancreas involvement, 4 adrenal gland involvement, 2 brain involvement, and 1 heart involvement. Conclusion. —Despite similar clinical features and therapeutic approaches, TTP and HUS each have a characteristic constellation of histopathologic findings. This observation suggests that TTP and HUS are 2 distinct disease entities with different pathophysiologies, and that they do not represent a spectrum of the same disease process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Caplacizumab for Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Peyvandi, F., Scully, M., Kremer Hovinga, J. A., Cataland, S., Knöbl, P., Wu, H., Artoni, A., Westwood, J.-P., Mansouri Taleghani, M., Jilma, B., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1505533 · Cited by 666
The Role of Plasmapheresis in Critical Illness
Nguyen, T. C., Kiss, J. E., Goldman, J. R., & Carcillo, J. A. (2012) · Critical Care Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2012.04.009 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Hosler, G. A., Cusumano, A. M., & Hutchins, G. M.
- Venue
- Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 834-839
- ISSN
- 0003-9985 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2165
- OpenAlex
- W2151245912
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Are Distinct Pathologic Entities: A Review of 56 Autopsy Cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5858/2003-127-834-ttpahu
- The paper
- Hosler, G. A., Cusumano, A. M., & Hutchins, G. M. (2003). Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Are Distinct Pathologic Entities: A Review of 56 Autopsy Cases. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.5858/2003-127-834-ttpahu
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.