The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is There an Information Literacy Skills Gap to Be Bridged? An Examination of Faculty Perceptions and Activities Relating to Information Literacy in the United States and England
Open accessAbstract
Surveys of faculty were conducted at two higher education institutions in England and the United States to ascertain their perceptions of information literacy. Faculty were also asked about the extent to which they incorporated information literacy skills into their courses. Similarities were found across the two institutions both in the importance that faculty attached to information skills and what they actually did to incorporate the skills within curricula. The results reflect an information literacy skills gap between what faculty (and librarians) want for their students and the practical reality. Librarians and faculty should work collaboratively together to bridge this gap.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Librarians, academics, lecturers, academic skills developers and other staff in Higher Education discuss and define information literacy, but can struggle to equip students with higher level, transferable, information skills.”
From Playful Information Literacy: Play and information Literacy in Higher Education (2015) · cites this paper as DaCosta, 2010
In the citing paper
“It can be seen that higher level information literacy skills are rarely explicitly addressed in Higher Education, though it would be valuable to do so (DaCosta, 2010; Markless, 2004; Saunders, 2012; Secker, 2011; Wang, 2007).”
From Playful Information Literacy: Play and information Literacy in Higher Education (2015) · cites this paper as DaCosta, 2010
Citations
Cites
Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education
Iannuzzi, P. A. (2000) · Community & Junior College Libraries · doi:10.1300/j107v09n04_09 · Cited by 2,330
(1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 882
Information Literacy in Higher Education: A review and case study
Johnston, B., & Webber, S. (2003) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070309295 · Cited by 392
McGuinness, C. (2006) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.06.002 · Cited by 234
A phenomenographic study of English faculty's conceptions of information literacy
Boon, S. I., Johnston, B., & Webber, S. (2007) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410710737187 · Cited by 204
Leckie, G. J. (1996) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/s0099-1333(96)90059-2 · Cited by 192
Student learning in the information age
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-4615 · Cited by 165
Faculty Perceptions of ACRL's Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education
Gullikson, S. (2006) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.06.001 · Cited by 103
Faculty‐librarian partnerships in Australian higher education: critical dimensions
Bruce, C. S. (2001) · Reference Services Review · doi:10.1108/00907320110394146 · Cited by 100
Perceptions and perplexities of the faculty‐librarian partnership: an Australian perspective
Doskatsch, I. (2003) · Reference Services Review · doi:10.1108/00907320310476585 · Cited by 98
Cited by
Faculty Perspectives on Information Literacy as a Student Learning Outcome
Saunders, L. (2012) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2012.06.001 · Cited by 190
Selecting quality sources: Bridging the gap between the perception and use of information sources
Kim, K., & Sin, S. J. (2011) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551511400958 · Cited by 132
Faculty attitudes, perceptions and experiences of information literacy:
Bury, S. (2011) · Journal of Information Literacy · doi:10.11645/5.1.1513 · Cited by 94
Faculty perceptions of students' information literacy skills competencies
Dubicki, E. (2013) · Journal of Information Literacy · doi:10.11645/7.2.1852 · Cited by 73
Conley, T. M., & Gil, E. L. (2011) · Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship · doi:10.1080/08963568.2011.581562 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- DaCosta, J. W.
- Affiliations
- The College of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- DaCosta, Jacqui Weetman
- Venue
- College & Research Libraries
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2010-05-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 203-222
- ISSN
- 0010-0870 (ISSN-L)
- 2150-6701
- OpenAlex
- W2101554091
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 72.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- College & Research Libraries (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Information Science and Libraries
- Keywords
- information literacy, teacher perceptions, curriculum integration, library-faculty collaboration, academic libraries, higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.