The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human rights and the uses of history
Abstract
What are the origins of human rights? This question, rarely asked before the end of the Cold War, has in recent years become a major focus of historical and ideological strife. In this sequence of reflective and critical studies, Samuel Moyn engages with some of the leading interpreters of human rights, thinkers who have been creating a field from scratch without due reflection on the local and temporal contexts of the stories they are telling. Having staked out his owns claims about the postwar origins of human rights discourse in his acclaimed Last Utopia, Moyn, in this volume, takes issue with rival conceptions - including, especially, those that underlie justifications of humanitarian intervention.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Humans as Animals and Things in Pre-Buddhist China
Nylan, M. (2019) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel10060360 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Moyn, S.
- Corresponding author
- Samuel Moyn
- ORCID
- Samuel Moyn
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2014-11-24
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 52-2239-52-2239
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W394403734
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Law and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Keywords
- human rights, origins of human rights, humanitarian intervention, uses of history, history and ideology, Samuel Moyn
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review