The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Liberalism: the life of an idea
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Liberals assumed that what people happened to want fixed their values and ideals, whereas in truth, values and ideals fixed what people ought to want.Values and ideals, in addition, grew out of shared practices in society, which alone gave people a purpose in life.Liberal modernity had dislocated society and shattered its practices [12, pp. 351-352].”
From No Longer "Neutral Among Ends" - Liberal Versus Communitarian Ethics in Library and Information Science (2021) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McMenemy, D. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71305-8_16 · Cited by 6
Neutrality in Library and Information Ethics: A Debate in Alternative Foundations
Oltmann, S., Knox, E., McMenemy, D., & Hamilton, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.869 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2014-12-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 52-2803-52-2803
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W4242341483
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Influence
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Keywords
- liberalism, intellectual history, political philosophy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liberalism: the life of an idea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.185587
- The paper
- Liberalism: the life of an idea. (2015). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.185587
