Cited by 274Political Conflict and GovernanceMilitary History and StrategyTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Networks of rebellion: explaining insurgent cohesion and collapse

Paul Staniland·2015·Choice Reviews Online

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.186660

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staniland, P.
Corresponding author
Paul Staniland
Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2015-02-24
Volume
52
Issue
07
Pages
52-3905-52-3905
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W572934041
Cited by
274
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Keywords
insurgency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review