Networks of rebellion: explaining insurgent cohesion and collapse
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dynamics and Logics of Civil War
Cederman, L.-E., & Vogt, M. (2017) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002717721385 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Non‐state authoritarianism and diaspora politics
ADAMSON, F. B. (2020) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/glob.12246 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
What Explains Counterterrorism Effectiveness? Evidence from the U.S. Drone War in Pakistan
Mir, A. (2018) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00331 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
- Authors
- Staniland, P.
- Corresponding author
- Paul Staniland
- ORCID
- Paul Staniland
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2015-02-24
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 52-3905-52-3905
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W572934041
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Keywords
- insurgency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review